Tools & Wizards About Us
webjooll.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

webjooll.com

Website Designing Company in Delhi, Web Design & Development in India

Page Load Speed

10.5 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

368 ms

webjooll.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webjooll.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Jooll content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webjooll.com

Webjooll is website designing company in Delhi, We offer best web design services at affordable prices. We are proved to be the best web designing company

Visit webjooll.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webjooll.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webjooll.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.273

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webjooll.com

2968 ms

www.webjooll.com

2739 ms

autoptimize_36b3f433ffb5873aa5875a898d47b5b8.css

377 ms

css

60 ms

autoptimize_f7084b177ec0f17bf1fde9be23f2dac1.js

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Webjooll.com, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Webjooll.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 446.3 kB (54%)

Content Size

834.2 kB

After Optimization

387.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webjooll.com main page is 834.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 352.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 215.6 kB
  • After minification 215.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Jooll images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 227.3 kB

  • Original 352.0 kB
  • After minification 352.0 kB
  • After compression 124.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 227.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 204.3 kB

  • Original 246.1 kB
  • After minification 245.8 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webjooll.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Jooll. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webjooll.com

webjooll.com

2968 ms

www.webjooll.com

www.webjooll.com

2739 ms

autoptimize_36b3f433ffb5873aa5875a898d47b5b8.css

autoptimize_36b3f433ffb5873aa5875a898d47b5b8.css

377 ms

css

css

60 ms

autoptimize_f7084b177ec0f17bf1fde9be23f2dac1.js

autoptimize_f7084b177ec0f17bf1fde9be23f2dac1.js

294 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

462 ms

ga.js

ga.js

94 ms

logo.png

logo.png

493 ms

gray-line.png

gray-line.png

390 ms

redchillinetwork.jpg

redchillinetwork.jpg

624 ms

school_template.jpg

school_template.jpg

560 ms

row.jpg

row.jpg

494 ms

row-1.jpg

row-1.jpg

668 ms

redchillinetwork.jpg

redchillinetwork.jpg

490 ms

bulk_sms_template-1.jpg

bulk_sms_template-1.jpg

493 ms

school_template.jpg

school_template.jpg

640 ms

sprite-ico60x60.png

sprite-ico60x60.png

598 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

598 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

618 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

664 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

116 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

613 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

56 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

75 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

81 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

81 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

262 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

252 ms

Accessibility Review

webjooll.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webjooll.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webjooll.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webjooll.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webjooll.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webjooll.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Jooll. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: