Tools & Wizards About Us
webondemand.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

webondemand.com

Web Dev Revolution: AI-Powered No-Code / Low-Code Platform

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

895 ms

webondemand.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Ondemand content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webondemand.com

The ultimate tool for website creators and businesses: no code web development platform with CMS, website builder, AI content generator, AI SEO, and more.

Visit webondemand.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webondemand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webondemand.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webondemand.com

37 ms

webondemand.com

119 ms

js

119 ms

nc9t5e8gln

120 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Webondemand.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Site-assets.fontawesome.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 189.2 kB (26%)

Content Size

727.2 kB

After Optimization

538.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webondemand.com main page is 727.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 69.2 kB

  • Original 89.3 kB
  • After minification 88.4 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

  • Original 47.5 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Ondemand needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.5 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 26.4 kB

  • Original 341.6 kB
  • After minification 341.6 kB
  • After compression 315.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 248.8 kB
  • After minification 248.8 kB
  • After compression 175.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webondemand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (76%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Ondemand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webondemand.com

webondemand.com

37 ms

webondemand.com

webondemand.com

119 ms

js

js

119 ms

nc9t5e8gln

nc9t5e8gln

120 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

80 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

75 ms

animate.css

animate.css

37 ms

PureMegaMenu.css

PureMegaMenu.css

66 ms

css2

css2

105 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

78 ms

style.css

style.css

104 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

97 ms

dropzone.js

dropzone.js

73 ms

ajax1.js

ajax1.js

75 ms

css2

css2

151 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

99 ms

all.css

all.css

155 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

150 ms

hs-mega-menu.min.css

hs-mega-menu.min.css

69 ms

css2

css2

174 ms

css2

css2

177 ms

css2

css2

177 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

116 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

72 ms

fade-down.css

fade-down.css

72 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

74 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

74 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

93 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

102 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

112 ms

animate.css

animate.css

95 ms

style.css

style.css

113 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

173 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

111 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

99 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

119 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

112 ms

jquery.scrollto.js

jquery.scrollto.js

119 ms

menu.js

menu.js

120 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

120 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

149 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

150 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

148 ms

quick-form.js

quick-form.js

145 ms

request-form.js

request-form.js

149 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

171 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

170 ms

wow.js

wow.js

170 ms

custom.js

custom.js

170 ms

widget.js

widget.js

257 ms

api.js

api.js

97 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

119 ms

nc4pxecdux

nc4pxecdux

74 ms

logo_webondemand.png-sml.webp

logo_webondemand.png-sml.webp

69 ms

just_on_800.png-sml.webp

just_on_800.png-sml.webp

35 ms

illustration_1-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_1-ai.png-lrg.webp

36 ms

illustration_2-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_2-ai.png-lrg.webp

35 ms

hero-1.jpeg-lrg.webp

hero-1.jpeg-lrg.webp

34 ms

bg-shape-1.png-sml.webp

bg-shape-1.png-sml.webp

34 ms

bg-shape-2.png-sml.webp

bg-shape-2.png-sml.webp

35 ms

illustration_4-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_4-ai.png-lrg.webp

36 ms

illustration_3-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_3-ai.png-lrg.webp

37 ms

illustration_5-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_5-ai.png-lrg.webp

38 ms

illustration_6-ai.png-lrg.webp

illustration_6-ai.png-lrg.webp

37 ms

NewSpacer2.png

NewSpacer2.png

36 ms

logo_white.png-sml.webp

logo_white.png-sml.webp

37 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1Uw.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1Uw.woff

175 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYi1Uw.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYi1Uw.woff

309 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYi1Uw.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYi1Uw.woff

310 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-1Uw.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-1Uw.woff

497 ms

mem9YaCnxnKRiYZOCLYW.woff

mem9YaCnxnKRiYZOCLYW.woff

294 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

368 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

373 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

371 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

369 ms

flaticon.ttf

flaticon.ttf

136 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

366 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

368 ms

back-to-top.png

back-to-top.png

156 ms

Accessibility Review

webondemand.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

webondemand.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webondemand.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webondemand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webondemand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webondemand.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Ondemand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: