Tools & Wizards About Us
webweaving.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

webweaving.com

Website Design, Graphic Design, Wordpress sites in Charlottesville Virginia located in Greene County.

Page Load Speed

815 ms in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

598 ms

Page Rendered

140 ms

webweaving.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webweaving content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webweaving.com

Web Weaving offers a full range of Web development services including customized graphic designs, creative writing, multimedia production, e-commerce, and search engine promotion.

Visit webweaving.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webweaving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 738 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webweaving.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webweaving.com

77 ms

www.webweaving.com

161 ms

style.css

25 ms

navigation.css

49 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Webweaving.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (228 ms) belongs to the original domain Webweaving.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (72%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

567.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webweaving.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 499.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webweaving needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 327 B

  • Original 56.0 kB
  • After minification 56.0 kB
  • After compression 55.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webweaving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (7%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webweaving. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webweaving.com

webweaving.com

77 ms

www.webweaving.com

www.webweaving.com

161 ms

style.css

style.css

25 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

49 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

67 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

94 ms

navvie.js

navvie.js

69 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

70 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

69 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

speechie.png

speechie.png

115 ms

phonie.png

phonie.png

114 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

116 ms

logo.png

logo.png

116 ms

bg_one.png

bg_one.png

142 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

116 ms

slideon.png

slideon.png

119 ms

graphic_one.png

graphic_one.png

117 ms

lilarrow.png

lilarrow.png

116 ms

bg_two.png

bg_two.png

175 ms

graphic_two.png

graphic_two.png

118 ms

bg_three.png

bg_three.png

186 ms

graphic_three.png

graphic_three.png

118 ms

bg_four.png

bg_four.png

164 ms

graphic_four.png

graphic_four.png

118 ms

icon_one.png

icon_one.png

119 ms

icon_two.png

icon_two.png

130 ms

icon_three.png

icon_three.png

136 ms

icon_four.png

icon_four.png

137 ms

rwmorris.jpg

rwmorris.jpg

186 ms

timbuck2.jpg

timbuck2.jpg

197 ms

thevue.jpg

thevue.jpg

156 ms

auburnhill.jpg

auburnhill.jpg

180 ms

papaweaver.jpg

papaweaver.jpg

185 ms

regencysl.jpg

regencysl.jpg

193 ms

icon_design.png

icon_design.png

203 ms

icon_graphic.png

icon_graphic.png

205 ms

icon_wordpress.png

icon_wordpress.png

208 ms

icon_promotion.png

icon_promotion.png

206 ms

logo_cville.png

logo_cville.png

215 ms

logo_greene.png

logo_greene.png

217 ms

footlogo.png

footlogo.png

224 ms

footphone.png

footphone.png

226 ms

footface.png

footface.png

228 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

127 ms

prev_mouse.png

prev_mouse.png

136 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

next_mouse.png

next_mouse.png

133 ms

Accessibility Review

webweaving.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webweaving.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webweaving.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webweaving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webweaving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webweaving.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webweaving. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: