3.8 sec in total
180 ms
3 sec
692 ms
Visit webyog.com now to see the best up-to-date Webyog content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webyog.com
SQL DM is a MySQL monitoring tool that gives DBAs real-time insights for optimizing the performance of MySQL servers.
Visit webyog.comWe analyzed Webyog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
webyog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
180 ms
331 ms
33 ms
497 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Webyog.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Webyog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 437.5 kB (14%)
3.1 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Webyog.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 335.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webyog needs image optimization as it can save up to 335.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webyog.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (54%)
82
38
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webyog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webyog.com
180 ms
webyog.com
331 ms
1x0ed.css
33 ms
9ufwv.css
497 ms
css
40 ms
1x0ed.css
318 ms
post-10.css
251 ms
1x0ed.css
40 ms
post-1042.css
260 ms
post-8369.css
51 ms
1x0ed.css
69 ms
post-8634.css
297 ms
post-8671.css
87 ms
css
37 ms
1x0ed.js
105 ms
1x0ed.js
122 ms
1x0ed.css
78 ms
lst_util.js
106 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
121 ms
theme.min.js
138 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
151 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
164 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
179 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
192 ms
ow-slider.min.js
420 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
212 ms
scroll-top.min.js
218 ms
select.min.js
227 ms
main.min.js
228 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
242 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
241 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
623 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
257 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
256 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
621 ms
hooks.min.js
268 ms
i18n.min.js
272 ms
frontend.min.js
283 ms
waypoints.min.js
284 ms
core.min.js
296 ms
frontend.min.js
300 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
310 ms
gtm.js
196 ms
Webyog-Logo-PB.svg
325 ms
WBG_Background-Blog-min.png
718 ms
Grid.png
326 ms
WBG_IMG20-min.jpeg
575 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey1.png
326 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey2.jpg
326 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey3.jpg
576 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey4.jpg
576 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey5.jpg
577 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey6.jpg
473 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey7.jpg
636 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey8.jpg
722 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey9.jpg
775 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey10.jpg
770 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey11.jpg
772 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey12.jpg
868 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey13.jpg
940 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey14.jpg
956 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey15.jpg
1004 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey16.jpg
1014 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey17.jpg
1005 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey18.jpg
1146 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey19.jpg
1173 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey20.jpg
1202 ms
WBG_Logos-Grey21.jpg
1236 ms
WBG_Icon-01.png
1249 ms
Rectangle-66.png
1591 ms
WBG_Icon-02.png
1364 ms
SQLyog-Ultimate-Team.png
1677 ms
CLOUD.png
1707 ms
WBG_Icon-03.png
1466 ms
Aqua-Data-Studio.png
1827 ms
WBG_IMG16-min.jpg
1879 ms
EVOLVE-2.png
1611 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
102 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff
103 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
225 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
260 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
259 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
260 ms
insight.min.js
235 ms
d5713f67cdaaec0f7bc62788830f365e.js
648 ms
js
145 ms
js
222 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
197 ms
landing
83 ms
main.js
9 ms
webyog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webyog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webyog.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webyog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webyog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webyog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webyog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: