Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

whichsatnav.com

Which Sat Nav? | The Definitive GPS Guide for Driving, Sport & Hiking

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

359 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

whichsatnav.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Which Sat Nav content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whichsatnav.com

Let us help you find the best GPS device whether you are driving, biking, running, hiking or geocaching. Discover the best Garmin and TomTom devices for your needs and get planning your next adventure...

Visit whichsatnav.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whichsatnav.com page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whichsatnav.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,340 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whichsatnav.com

359 ms

bYtBDsMgDAQ_VOpW6ocIMQE12MhLiPr7Rpw45LCH3Zl9U1HxFhIFgNB-Oz9eZJyOxX3Gxts26jTfacaoKsh9BkhqLejKGM6VCXYf6_WCi-YLn2pfqsey5zDczrKqUVRpzp8MLfwsWf4.css

20 ms

css

113 ms

css

116 ms

LYhRDoAgDMUuJE6DF0IZOuIgPuFDTy9Gf5q2luJRGVdnfzEqK1zhXiW1WYWWjK9GUi7OeNcQZC8MiicF5FS6gcBbnc30Ls2ekeTGAw.js

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Whichsatnav.com, 30% (32 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Whichsatnav.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 766.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 273.9 kB

  • Original 333.2 kB
  • After minification 300.7 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 273.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 766.2 kB
  • After minification 742.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Which Sat Nav images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 375.3 kB

  • Original 592.4 kB
  • After minification 579.8 kB
  • After compression 217.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 375.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 368.3 kB

  • Original 443.6 kB
  • After minification 439.2 kB
  • After compression 75.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whichsatnav.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 368.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (38%)

Requests Now

96

After Optimization

60

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Which Sat Nav. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whichsatnav.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

whichsatnav.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

whichsatnav.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whichsatnav.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whichsatnav.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Which Sat Nav. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: