3.6 sec in total
764 ms
2.7 sec
190 ms
Welcome to whiteonwhite.com homepage info - get ready to check Whiteonwhite best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about whiteonwhite.com
Visit whiteonwhite.comWe analyzed Whiteonwhite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
whiteonwhite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value10.0 s
1/100
25%
Value8.2 s
21/100
10%
Value2,710 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value21.0 s
2/100
10%
764 ms
131 ms
310 ms
187 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Whiteonwhite.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Vs3.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Whiteonwhite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (41%)
3.5 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Whiteonwhite.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whiteonwhite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 951.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 951.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 294.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whiteonwhite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 294.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (46%)
115
62
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whiteonwhite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whiteonwhite.com
764 ms
skeleton.css
131 ms
style.css
310 ms
prettyPhoto.css
187 ms
flexslider.css
133 ms
layout.css
188 ms
custom.css
177 ms
output.css
191 ms
styles.css
191 ms
fontsforwebstyle.css
237 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.14.custom.css
315 ms
colorpicker.css
246 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
249 ms
woocommerce.css
432 ms
pagenavi-css.css
296 ms
thickbox.min.css
313 ms
jquery.js
492 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
uboxdim.js
363 ms
jquery.fcarousel.min.js
365 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
367 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
419 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
424 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
426 ms
jquery.ui.slider.min.js
428 ms
colorpicker.js
480 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
485 ms
jquery.fontPlugin.js
671 ms
pluginscripts.js
489 ms
thickbox.min.js
516 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
styles.css
435 ms
custom_styles.css
441 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
505 ms
hoverIntent.js
445 ms
superfish.js
448 ms
supersubs.js
494 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
498 ms
jquery.tweet.js
494 ms
tinynav.min.js
491 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
495 ms
functions.min.js
491 ms
jquery.form.min.js
587 ms
scripts.js
584 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
585 ms
woocommerce.min.js
537 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
531 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
526 ms
dvin_wcwl.js
479 ms
css
25 ms
whiteonwhite.com
645 ms
phone-pic.png
81 ms
mail-pic.png
158 ms
new-logo.png
159 ms
search-pic.png
160 ms
header_sprite.png
158 ms
study-chairs-960x450.jpg
194 ms
OM-florence-ext-web3-960x450.jpg
343 ms
Tom-Lenz-sculp-web3-960x450.jpg
299 ms
wish-chairs-group-ny-mag3-copy.jpeg
238 ms
linz-art1-960x450.jpg
193 ms
karlo-set-up-ls-2-960x450.jpg
363 ms
java-kashgar-960x450.jpeg
370 ms
brooklyn-ext3-700x450.jpeg
361 ms
golden-chair1-960x450.jpg
446 ms
sl.png
404 ms
sr.png
447 ms
white_furniture_blank_banner.png
448 ms
Siena-4-205x205.png
449 ms
Belt-B-chair-205x205.png
471 ms
Cincinnati-B-Black-205x205.png
483 ms
Papillon-chair-205x205.png
484 ms
Florence-A-sofa-205x205.png
485 ms
Kashgar-%E2%80%93-B-chair-205x205.png
493 ms
Fuji-A-table-205x205.png
531 ms
pod-table-205x205.png
544 ms
Wales-chair-205x205.png
546 ms
Trilight-205x205.png
546 ms
default
381 ms
piwik.js
522 ms
Florence-A-Red-Velvet-sofa-205x205.png
520 ms
Larson-Bench-Fabric-205x205.png
533 ms
Sultan-B-205x205.png
534 ms
Jensen-Sofa-205x205.png
534 ms
Kin-Sofa-205x205.png
541 ms
Milton-C-Sofa-205x205.png
579 ms
Milton-A-Single-205x205.png
593 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
75 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
75 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
75 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
75 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
75 ms
Sultan-C-%E2%80%93-Walnut-205x205.png
593 ms
300lo.json
41 ms
admin-ajax.php
1024 ms
Malin-Leather-205x205.png
517 ms
Linz-A-chair-205x205.png
523 ms
Miami-1-W-205x205.png
566 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
29 ms
Bamboo-A-205x205.png
541 ms
Escargot-table-205x205.png
540 ms
Magnolia-Dining-Table-205x205.png
498 ms
pixel
17 ms
pixel
15 ms
Kanga-stool-205x205.png
445 ms
Sophia-205x205.png
428 ms
Biblio-table-205x205.png
434 ms
Linz-B-sofa-205x205.png
435 ms
Malin-Fabric-205x205.png
430 ms
Larson-Bench-Leather-205x205.png
401 ms
Skandy-%E2%80%93-leather-chair1-205x205.png
386 ms
1.png
410 ms
2.png
410 ms
icons.png
30 ms
1458465878335
226 ms
3.png
450 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
393 ms
ajax-loader-3.gif
15 ms
168 ms
39 ms
254 ms
v3
59 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
64 ms
slider-dots.png
64 ms
whiteonwhite.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
whiteonwhite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
whiteonwhite.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteonwhite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whiteonwhite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whiteonwhite.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whiteonwhite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: