Tools & Wizards About Us
willosecurity.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

willosecurity.com

Ohio and Kentucky Security Guard Company - Royce U.S. Protection Service

Page Load Speed

989 ms in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

762 ms

Page Rendered

191 ms

willosecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to willosecurity.com homepage info - get ready to check Willo Security best content right away, or after learning these important things about willosecurity.com

Ohio and Kentucky Security Guard Company

Visit willosecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Willosecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 953 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

willosecurity.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

willosecurity.com

36 ms

roycesecurityguards.net

80 ms

css

80 ms

2ad94a035aad44f5d5615062a76330fa.css

31 ms

style.min.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Willosecurity.com, 60% (28 requests) were made to Roycesecurityguards.net and 19% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

847.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Willosecurity.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 572.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 156.3 kB

  • Original 206.7 kB
  • After minification 203.5 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Willo Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 87.3 kB

  • Original 572.8 kB
  • After minification 572.8 kB
  • After compression 485.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 265.4 kB
  • After minification 264.9 kB
  • After compression 264.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Willosecurity.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Willo Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

willosecurity.com

willosecurity.com

36 ms

roycesecurityguards.net

roycesecurityguards.net

80 ms

css

css

80 ms

2ad94a035aad44f5d5615062a76330fa.css

2ad94a035aad44f5d5615062a76330fa.css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

55 ms

461dbd8f98416638c2d92894e0cb1f3d.css

461dbd8f98416638c2d92894e0cb1f3d.css

59 ms

buttons.min.css

buttons.min.css

55 ms

169d5bddeea44aca2ab197e6ccc0b38e.css

169d5bddeea44aca2ab197e6ccc0b38e.css

45 ms

media-views.min.css

media-views.min.css

56 ms

eb01dd41ad027d2d39277343027ad349.css

eb01dd41ad027d2d39277343027ad349.css

156 ms

aea17e6bf1d3ac595c3974d0b1c37e78.css

aea17e6bf1d3ac595c3974d0b1c37e78.css

75 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

960624a043cbd31ff3cb9eabbec0907f.js

960624a043cbd31ff3cb9eabbec0907f.js

158 ms

672210cf1bd85627112888c4bc3b6bf3.js

672210cf1bd85627112888c4bc3b6bf3.js

157 ms

js

js

161 ms

css

css

155 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

60 ms

badge.js

badge.js

59 ms

b1884274247b10cae9691bdd2c3f1228.css

b1884274247b10cae9691bdd2c3f1228.css

154 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

160 ms

0db498e53961b079fb6490b2f545c19e.js

0db498e53961b079fb6490b2f545c19e.js

156 ms

b1c67d26a18f03f697ae11bc4954ea7c.js

b1c67d26a18f03f697ae11bc4954ea7c.js

157 ms

stock-photos.min.js

stock-photos.min.js

155 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

161 ms

575c9411d8f7a5cb2a48d218dcc1a7a1.js

575c9411d8f7a5cb2a48d218dcc1a7a1.js

156 ms

ba726eecebfc790d47182c7c52a3e763.js

ba726eecebfc790d47182c7c52a3e763.js

157 ms

349225620377eb634b23569385eadfcc.js

349225620377eb634b23569385eadfcc.js

160 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

159 ms

1caf2aa8861eb894efff4a4fd6c3d02c.js

1caf2aa8861eb894efff4a4fd6c3d02c.js

159 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

8 ms

api.js

api.js

90 ms

style.css

style.css

17 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

11 ms

ga.js

ga.js

79 ms

security.jpg

security.jpg

82 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

92 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

331 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

333 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

334 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

332 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

332 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

333 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

331 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

334 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

57 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

281 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

68 ms

Accessibility Review

willosecurity.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

willosecurity.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

willosecurity.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Willosecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Willosecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

willosecurity.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Willo Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: