1.3 sec in total
25 ms
457 ms
845 ms
Visit winepak.org now to see the best up-to-date Wine Pak content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about winepak.org
However, new Windows applications are being developed every day. Many of them will not work in Wine the way we want them to.
Visit winepak.orgWe analyzed Winepak.org page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
winepak.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
25 ms
49 ms
90 ms
10 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Winepak.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (158 ms) belongs to the original domain Winepak.org.
Page size can be reduced by 136.5 kB (9%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Winepak.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wine Pak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Winepak.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (42%)
50
29
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wine Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
winepak.org
25 ms
winepak.org
49 ms
www.winepak.org
90 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
10 ms
style.min.css
20 ms
classic-themes.min.css
23 ms
styles.css
24 ms
css
26 ms
slick.css
24 ms
slick-theme.css
23 ms
magnific-popup.css
26 ms
font-awesome.css
27 ms
blocks.css
30 ms
style.css
43 ms
jquery.min.js
52 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
40 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
40 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
42 ms
index.js
41 ms
index.js
81 ms
slick.js
87 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
81 ms
navigation.js
82 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
81 ms
custom.js
86 ms
blog-ajax.js
85 ms
12-8.jpg
149 ms
10-7.jpg
151 ms
11-7.jpg
149 ms
33.jpg
149 ms
5-7.jpg
147 ms
2-6.jpg
150 ms
logo_dark_bg-1.png
150 ms
casinoreal-175x175-b_w.png
152 ms
RepairsBay-175_175.png
150 ms
mecca-bingo-online-slots-games.png
151 ms
1-1.jpg
152 ms
logo175.png
152 ms
logo-aprobare-175x175-1.png
153 ms
NGSB_White_bg_logo.png
153 ms
175x175.png
154 ms
cassinosbrasil-175x175-1.png
154 ms
point_round-4.png
155 ms
2023-07-07_14.10.32.png
154 ms
super_tucano_2.png
155 ms
6-7.jpg
156 ms
4-7.jpg
155 ms
1-6.jpg
158 ms
13-6.jpg
156 ms
8-6.jpg
157 ms
7-6.jpg
157 ms
9-5.jpg
156 ms
ajax-loader.gif
16 ms
KtkxAKiDZI_td1Lkx62xHZHDtgO_Y-bvTYlg5g.ttf
28 ms
m8JVjfNVeKWVnh3QMuKkFcZVaUuC.ttf
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
winepak.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
winepak.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
winepak.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Winepak.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Winepak.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
winepak.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wine Pak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: