2.8 sec in total
864 ms
1.7 sec
250 ms
Visit wolfelandscaping.net now to see the best up-to-date Wolfe Landscaping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wolfelandscaping.net
landscaping
Visit wolfelandscaping.netWe analyzed Wolfelandscaping.net page load time and found that the first response time was 864 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
wolfelandscaping.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.4 s
73/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
864 ms
30 ms
23 ms
135 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wolfelandscaping.net, 47% (7 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolfelandscaping.net.
Page size can be reduced by 448.4 kB (73%)
615.3 kB
166.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Wolfelandscaping.net main page is 615.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 483.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 413.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 413.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wolfe Landscaping images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)
14
9
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolfe Landscaping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wolfelandscaping.net
864 ms
bt
30 ms
minified.js
23 ms
fetch.umd.js
135 ms
bolt-custom-elements.min.js
169 ms
requirejs.min.js
170 ms
bolt-performance
9 ms
dynamicmodel
69 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
121 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
119 ms
c25321_642577041e5240518bcebe4a7cc4e233.jpg
591 ms
ec1702ddacb0c729e5056ffe361d5d81.jpg
346 ms
84770f_5cb92da84c30f6c984f4e903f4e014bd.jpg
98 ms
arrows_white_new3.png
88 ms
bt
18 ms
wolfelandscaping.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wolfelandscaping.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wolfelandscaping.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolfelandscaping.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wolfelandscaping.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wolfelandscaping.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wolfe Landscaping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: