Tools & Wizards About Us
wolfelandscaping.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

wolfelandscaping.net

Wolfe Landscaping

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

864 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

250 ms

wolfelandscaping.net screenshot

About Website

Visit wolfelandscaping.net now to see the best up-to-date Wolfe Landscaping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wolfelandscaping.net

landscaping

Visit wolfelandscaping.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Wolfelandscaping.net page load time and found that the first response time was 864 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wolfelandscaping.net performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wolfelandscaping.net

864 ms

bt

30 ms

minified.js

23 ms

fetch.umd.js

135 ms

bolt-custom-elements.min.js

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wolfelandscaping.net, 47% (7 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolfelandscaping.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.4 kB (73%)

Content Size

615.3 kB

After Optimization

166.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wolfelandscaping.net main page is 615.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 483.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 413.7 kB

  • Original 483.4 kB
  • After minification 481.8 kB
  • After compression 69.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 413.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wolfe Landscaping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 91.9 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolfe Landscaping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wolfelandscaping.net

www.wolfelandscaping.net

864 ms

bt

bt

30 ms

minified.js

minified.js

23 ms

fetch.umd.js

fetch.umd.js

135 ms

bolt-custom-elements.min.js

bolt-custom-elements.min.js

169 ms

requirejs.min.js

requirejs.min.js

170 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

9 ms

dynamicmodel

dynamicmodel

69 ms

wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js

wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js

121 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

119 ms

c25321_642577041e5240518bcebe4a7cc4e233.jpg

c25321_642577041e5240518bcebe4a7cc4e233.jpg

591 ms

ec1702ddacb0c729e5056ffe361d5d81.jpg

ec1702ddacb0c729e5056ffe361d5d81.jpg

346 ms

84770f_5cb92da84c30f6c984f4e903f4e014bd.jpg

84770f_5cb92da84c30f6c984f4e903f4e014bd.jpg

98 ms

arrows_white_new3.png

arrows_white_new3.png

88 ms

bt

bt

18 ms

Accessibility Review

wolfelandscaping.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wolfelandscaping.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wolfelandscaping.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolfelandscaping.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wolfelandscaping.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wolfelandscaping.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wolfe Landscaping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: