Tools & Wizards About Us
womenreviewed.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

womenreviewed.com

Top Female Enhancement Pills 2020. Current product reviews on natural female sexual enhancement, skin care, and anti-aging for 2020.

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

231 ms

Resources Loaded

840 ms

Page Rendered

403 ms

womenreviewed.com screenshot

About Website

Visit womenreviewed.com now to see the best up-to-date Womenreviewed content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about womenreviewed.com

Female Enhancement Reviews 2020 - Independent and unbaised reviews of female enhancement pills, gels, creams, and more.

Visit womenreviewed.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Womenreviewed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

womenreviewed.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

womenreviewed.com

231 ms

style.css

62 ms

logo.jpg

119 ms

twitter.png

119 ms

body-top-curve.gif

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Womenreviewed.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) belongs to the original domain Womenreviewed.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

370.4 kB

After Optimization

295.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Womenreviewed.com main page is 370.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 328.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 39.7 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 42.6 kB

  • Original 328.2 kB
  • After minification 285.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Womenreviewed needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 710 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Womenreviewed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 710 B or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Womenreviewed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

womenreviewed.com

womenreviewed.com

231 ms

style.css

style.css

62 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

119 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

119 ms

body-top-curve.gif

body-top-curve.gif

121 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

119 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

120 ms

gradient.jpg

gradient.jpg

122 ms

free-download2.png

free-download2.png

178 ms

e-book-button.jpg

e-book-button.jpg

233 ms

download3.jpg

download3.jpg

178 ms

adobePDF.gif

adobePDF.gif

179 ms

women-reviewed-exclusive.png

women-reviewed-exclusive.png

181 ms

cheryl-powers.jpg

cheryl-powers.jpg

181 ms

samantha-boll.jpg

samantha-boll.jpg

237 ms

teri-williams.jpg

teri-williams.jpg

237 ms

maria-perez.jpg

maria-perez.jpg

239 ms

female-libido-pills.jpg

female-libido-pills.jpg

240 ms

female-libido-gels.jpg

female-libido-gels.jpg

274 ms

female-libido-sprays.jpg

female-libido-sprays.jpg

291 ms

female-sex-enhancers.jpg

female-sex-enhancers.jpg

298 ms

provestra.jpg

provestra.jpg

294 ms

femestril-small.jpg

femestril-small.jpg

356 ms

vigorelle.jpg

vigorelle.jpg

299 ms

skin-care.jpg

skin-care.jpg

358 ms

skincare-products.jpg

skincare-products.jpg

349 ms

kollagen-intensive.jpg

kollagen-intensive.jpg

354 ms

clear-pores.jpg

clear-pores.jpg

356 ms

skinception.jpg

skinception.jpg

359 ms

review-of-the-week.png

review-of-the-week.png

410 ms

reviewoftheweek.jpg

reviewoftheweek.jpg

414 ms

anti-aging.jpg

anti-aging.jpg

415 ms

anti-aging-products.jpg

anti-aging-products.jpg

416 ms

genf20-review.jpg

genf20-review.jpg

418 ms

genfx-review.jpg

genfx-review.jpg

418 ms

omega-daily-review.jpg

omega-daily-review.jpg

468 ms

improve-female-libido3.jpg

improve-female-libido3.jpg

476 ms

nav-curve-btm.jpg

nav-curve-btm.jpg

419 ms

nav-curve-top.jpg

nav-curve-top.jpg

364 ms

body-btm-curve.gif

body-btm-curve.gif

368 ms

body.jpg

body.jpg

367 ms

header-right-bg.jpg

header-right-bg.jpg

471 ms

menu-active.jpg

menu-active.jpg

423 ms

blue-bg.gif

blue-bg.gif

421 ms

check_icon.gif

check_icon.gif

365 ms

blue-heading1.jpg

blue-heading1.jpg

368 ms

navlist-bg-n.jpg

navlist-bg-n.jpg

368 ms

navlist-bg.jpg

navlist-bg.jpg

421 ms

blue-heading2.jpg

blue-heading2.jpg

421 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

371 ms

footer-bg.gif

footer-bg.gif

370 ms

Accessibility Review

womenreviewed.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

womenreviewed.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

womenreviewed.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenreviewed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Womenreviewed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

womenreviewed.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Womenreviewed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: