29.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
26.3 sec
497 ms
Visit wordjourney.com now to see the best up-to-date Wordjourney content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordjourney.com
Believe. Pray. Act.
Visit wordjourney.comWe analyzed Wordjourney.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 26.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
wordjourney.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
2547 ms
147 ms
181 ms
143 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Wordjourney.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wordjourney.com.
Page size can be reduced by 555.4 kB (55%)
1.0 MB
463.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Wordjourney.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 639.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wordjourney images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 413.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 413.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordjourney.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)
75
23
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordjourney. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wordjourney.com
2547 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
style.css
181 ms
pagenavi-css.css
143 ms
styles.css
141 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
141 ms
sociable.css
276 ms
style.css
284 ms
snazzy-archives.css
304 ms
jquery.js
379 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
342 ms
jquery.js
67 ms
galleria-1.2.6.min.js
340 ms
galleria.flickr.min.js
514 ms
galleria-common.js
509 ms
galleria.classic.min.js
522 ms
jquery.corner.js
543 ms
snazzy-archives.js
542 ms
addthis_widget.js
17 ms
plugin.css
550 ms
datatables.css
657 ms
scripts.js
522 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
540 ms
superfish.min.js
550 ms
superfish.args.min.js
551 ms
superfish.compat.min.js
577 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
682 ms
ga.js
150 ms
__utm.gif
175 ms
galleria.classic.css
285 ms
galleria.classic.css
133 ms
bg.png
228 ms
toddler-boy.jpg
426 ms
printfriendly.png
226 ms
digg.png
227 ms
facebook.png
225 ms
bluedot.png
121 ms
googlebookmark.png
226 ms
linkedin.png
305 ms
mixx.png
243 ms
pdf.png
292 ms
stumbleupon.png
292 ms
technorati.png
332 ms
twitter.png
304 ms
feed-large.gif
435 ms
bible-study.jpg
435 ms
twitter.png
457 ms
facebook.png
482 ms
googleplus.png
478 ms
wrap.png
495 ms
header.png
20236 ms
nav-line.png
439 ms
bg-light.png
533 ms
list.png
556 ms
reftagger.js
413 ms
efd6FGWWGX5Z3ztwLBrG9c2kigAIKUS7C8wDj9A45hI.ttf
101 ms
WZDISdyil4HsmirlOdBRFJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
102 ms
sdk.js
276 ms
300lo.json
36 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
425 ms
widgets.js
90 ms
pinit00.png
56 ms
counter.270bdfcf33bafb0fc8fc.js
24 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
45 ms
shares.json
53 ms
button.71000885400e222c3c0eec823f8f93f0.js
134 ms
101 ms
161 ms
xd_arbiter.php
228 ms
xd_arbiter.php
438 ms
tweet_button.fd774b599f565016d763dd860cb31c79.en.html
41 ms
log
273 ms
jot
88 ms
like.php
113 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
299 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
316 ms
ping
73 ms
like.php
102 ms
wordjourney.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wordjourney.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wordjourney.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordjourney.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wordjourney.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordjourney.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wordjourney. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: