Tools & Wizards About Us
writingmaniac.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

writingmaniac.com

UK49s Lunchtime Results Today 2023 and UK Lunchtime Result

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

745 ms

Page Rendered

636 ms

writingmaniac.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingmaniac.com homepage info - get ready to check Writingmaniac best content right away, or after learning these important things about writingmaniac.com

Lunchtime results for today in 2023. The latest lunchtime result for South Africa and UK, UK49s afternoon result and yesterday lunch results.

Visit writingmaniac.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingmaniac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingmaniac.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.171

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

49sresult.co.za

118 ms

wpo-minify-header-512f945d.min.css

127 ms

wpo-minify-header-bd1d1455.min.js

126 ms

js

59 ms

adsbygoogle.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Writingmaniac.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (322 ms) relates to the external source 49sresult.co.za.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

690.2 kB

After Optimization

622.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingmaniac.com main page is 690.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 443.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 67.6 kB

  • Original 81.7 kB
  • After minification 78.3 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingmaniac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 392 B

  • Original 443.0 kB
  • After minification 443.0 kB
  • After compression 442.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 148.6 kB
  • After minification 148.6 kB
  • After compression 148.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingmaniac.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingmaniac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

49sresult.co.za

49sresult.co.za

118 ms

wpo-minify-header-512f945d.min.css

wpo-minify-header-512f945d.min.css

127 ms

wpo-minify-header-bd1d1455.min.js

wpo-minify-header-bd1d1455.min.js

126 ms

js

js

59 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

120 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

28 ms

wpo-minify-footer-38af9e7b.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-38af9e7b.min.js

90 ms

wpo-minify-footer-079b197b.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-079b197b.min.js

111 ms

wpo-minify-footer-3a781654.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-3a781654.min.js

322 ms

cropped-VL1.png

cropped-VL1.png

69 ms

orange-ball-01.png

orange-ball-01.png

123 ms

ss.png

ss.png

70 ms

yellow-ball-01.png

yellow-ball-01.png

120 ms

green-ball-01-1.png

green-ball-01-1.png

121 ms

cropped-VL1-150x150.png

cropped-VL1-150x150.png

121 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

230 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

78 ms

js

js

53 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

124 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

94 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

Accessibility Review

writingmaniac.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

writingmaniac.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

writingmaniac.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingmaniac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingmaniac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingmaniac.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writingmaniac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: