Tools & Wizards About Us
writingonthewall.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

writingonthewall.org.uk

Writing on the Wall - Supporting Writing in Liverpool City Region

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

637 ms

Page Rendered

670 ms

writingonthewall.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit writingonthewall.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Writing On The Wall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writingonthewall.org.uk

Writing on the Wall (WoW) is a creative arts organisation supporting writing in Liverpool, Merseyside. See how we can help you today.

Visit writingonthewall.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingonthewall.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingonthewall.org.uk performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.151

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writingonthewall.org.uk

52 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

37 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

48 ms

styles.css

63 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Writingonthewall.org.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (242 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingonthewall.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 236.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingonthewall.org.uk main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 82.4 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 75.0 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writing On The Wall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 145.3 kB
  • After compression 53.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (90%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing On The Wall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writingonthewall.org.uk

writingonthewall.org.uk

52 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

37 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

48 ms

styles.css

styles.css

63 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

39 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

49 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

57 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

69 ms

easy-responsive-tabs.css

easy-responsive-tabs.css

64 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

81 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

91 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

96 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

100 ms

post-3724.css

post-3724.css

107 ms

global.css

global.css

113 ms

css

css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

116 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

130 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

133 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

220 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

218 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

226 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

220 ms

s-202435.js

s-202435.js

34 ms

js

js

105 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

60 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

220 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

219 ms

index.js

index.js

225 ms

index.js

index.js

225 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

226 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

226 ms

wp-consent-api.min.js

wp-consent-api.min.js

228 ms

wp-consent-api-integration.min.js

wp-consent-api-integration.min.js

229 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

229 ms

easyResponsiveTabs.js

easyResponsiveTabs.js

235 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

236 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

240 ms

e-202435.js

e-202435.js

31 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

242 ms

common.js

common.js

211 ms

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

230 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

222 ms

p.css

p.css

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

103 ms

d

d

83 ms

d

d

103 ms

d

d

102 ms

logo.png

logo.png

33 ms

sarch.svg

sarch.svg

32 ms

WOWFEST-2560x1282-1.jpg

WOWFEST-2560x1282-1.jpg

40 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

31 ms

Accessibility Review

writingonthewall.org.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

writingonthewall.org.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

writingonthewall.org.uk SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingonthewall.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingonthewall.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingonthewall.org.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writing On The Wall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: