Tools & Wizards About Us
writingtools.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

writingtools.net

Content Writing Services | Hire Our Writers for High-Quality Content

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

366 ms

writingtools.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingtools.net homepage info - get ready to check Writing Tools best content right away, or after learning these important things about writingtools.net

We offer affordable article writing services. Order unique and high-quality content for your website. Hire the best freelance writers today.

Visit writingtools.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingtools.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingtools.net performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writingtools.net

1967 ms

styles.css

116 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

177 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

234 ms

toolbox-scripts.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Writingtools.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Writingtools.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 279.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

943.4 kB

After Optimization

664.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingtools.net main page is 943.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 368.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10 B

  • Original 134.8 kB
  • After minification 134.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writing Tools images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 58.8 kB

  • Original 351.6 kB
  • After minification 350.4 kB
  • After compression 292.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 368.0 kB
  • After minification 367.8 kB
  • After compression 219.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingtools.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (79%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writingtools.net

writingtools.net

1967 ms

styles.css

styles.css

116 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

177 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

234 ms

toolbox-scripts.css

toolbox-scripts.css

179 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

344 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

232 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

349 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

238 ms

post-3003.css

post-3003.css

238 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

354 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

294 ms

global.css

global.css

299 ms

post-349.css

post-349.css

357 ms

css

css

30 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

469 ms

iconfont.css

iconfont.css

359 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

404 ms

animate.css

animate.css

404 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

409 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

415 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

420 ms

navigation.min.css

navigation.min.css

466 ms

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

464 ms

jquery-ui.theme.min.css

jquery-ui.theme.min.css

473 ms

style.css

style.css

657 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

481 ms

gutenberg-custom.css

gutenberg-custom.css

525 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

637 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

528 ms

css

css

28 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

585 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

539 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

653 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

590 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

600 ms

toolbox-scripts.js

toolbox-scripts.js

686 ms

thco-internet-speed.js

thco-internet-speed.js

687 ms

js

js

58 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

643 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

589 ms

index.js

index.js

617 ms

index.js

index.js

618 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

563 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

592 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

588 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

586 ms

Popper.js

Popper.js

530 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

525 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

499 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

527 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

527 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

527 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

520 ms

scrollax.js

scrollax.js

479 ms

delighters.js

delighters.js

495 ms

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

548 ms

jquery.parallax.js

jquery.parallax.js

528 ms

main.js

main.js

524 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

494 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

477 ms

tilt.jquery.min.js

tilt.jquery.min.js

470 ms

anime.js

anime.js

531 ms

magician.js

magician.js

522 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

475 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

477 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

462 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

412 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

470 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

459 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

407 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

375 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

143 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

352 ms

banner-v2-img-1.jpg

banner-v2-img-1.jpg

430 ms

logo.png

logo.png

648 ms

service-info-icon-1.png

service-info-icon-1.png

340 ms

icon-4.png

icon-4.png

354 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

401 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

406 ms

service-info-icon-3.png

service-info-icon-3.png

335 ms

service-info-icon-6.png

service-info-icon-6.png

334 ms

service-img-1.png

service-img-1.png

334 ms

1f32ngb4h

1f32ngb4h

257 ms

js

js

92 ms

font

font

111 ms

font

font

110 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

364 ms

iconfont.ttf

iconfont.ttf

533 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

421 ms

service-summary-1.png

service-summary-1.png

372 ms

service-summary-2.png

service-summary-2.png

351 ms

list-dotted.png

list-dotted.png

351 ms

location.png

location.png

416 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

mail.png

mail.png

382 ms

phone.png

phone.png

382 ms

js

js

55 ms

Accessibility Review

writingtools.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

writingtools.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

writingtools.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingtools.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingtools.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingtools.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writing Tools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: