Tools & Wizards About Us
x-mirage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

x-mirage.com

X-Mirage - AirPlay and Google Cast Receiver, Screen Mirroring Receiver for Mac and PC

Page Load Speed

862 ms in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

616 ms

Page Rendered

155 ms

x-mirage.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to x-mirage.com homepage info - get ready to check X Mirage best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about x-mirage.com

X-Mirage turns your Mac and Windows PC into AirPlay Receiver and Google Cast receiver. X-Mirage, the screen mirroring receiver for Mac and Windows, can be used as Apple TV and Chromecast alternative. ...

Visit x-mirage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed X-mirage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

x-mirage.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.249

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

x-mirage.com

91 ms

x-mirage.com

102 ms

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original X-mirage.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (338 ms) belongs to the original domain X-mirage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 515.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of X-mirage.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 472.8 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, X Mirage needs image optimization as it can save up to 472.8 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 133.2 kB
  • After minification 133.2 kB
  • After compression 109.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 54.6 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 47.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. X-mirage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of X Mirage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

x-mirage.com

x-mirage.com

91 ms

x-mirage.com

x-mirage.com

102 ms

css

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

72 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

91 ms

settings.css

settings.css

105 ms

settings-ie8.css

settings-ie8.css

82 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

retina.css

retina.css

127 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

73 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

229 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

155 ms

jquery.event.drop-2.2.js

jquery.event.drop-2.2.js

156 ms

jquery.event.drag-2.2.js

jquery.event.drag-2.2.js

162 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

197 ms

jquery.roundabout.js

jquery.roundabout.js

198 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

199 ms

jflickrfeed.js

jflickrfeed.js

213 ms

jquery.mobile.menu.js

jquery.mobile.menu.js

226 ms

modernizr.custom.91224.js

modernizr.custom.91224.js

221 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

253 ms

jquery.colorbox.js

jquery.colorbox.js

281 ms

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

338 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

284 ms

custom.js

custom.js

285 ms

ga.js

ga.js

35 ms

blue-round.png

blue-round.png

137 ms

x-miragelogo.png

x-miragelogo.png

183 ms

jap.png

jap.png

205 ms

airplay-receiver-for-mac-pc.png

airplay-receiver-for-mac-pc.png

209 ms

page-home2.jpg

page-home2.jpg

205 ms

page-home3.jpg

page-home3.jpg

205 ms

page-home4.jpg

page-home4.jpg

244 ms

benefits-arrow-hover.png

benefits-arrow-hover.png

247 ms

widget-news-icons.png

widget-news-icons.png

250 ms

social-icons.png

social-icons.png

255 ms

font

font

50 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

68 ms

Accessibility Review

x-mirage.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

x-mirage.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

x-mirage.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise X-mirage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that X-mirage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

x-mirage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of X Mirage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: