4.5 sec in total
60 ms
4.4 sec
60 ms
Click here to check amazing Xattenger content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xattenger.com
Francesco Orsi, Creative & Full Stack Developer, Award-winning UX Designer and Developer based in London
Visit xattenger.comWe analyzed Xattenger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
xattenger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
60 ms
141 ms
65 ms
136 ms
135 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xattenger.com, 93% (25 requests) were made to Orsi.me and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Orsi.me.
Page size can be reduced by 17.7 kB (15%)
115.2 kB
97.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Xattenger.com main page is 115.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 101.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xattenger needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
We found no issues to fix!
24
24
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xattenger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
xattenger.com
60 ms
orsi.me
141 ms
js
65 ms
apple-icon-57x57.png
136 ms
apple-icon-60x60.png
135 ms
apple-icon-72x72.png
138 ms
apple-icon-76x76.png
136 ms
apple-icon-114x114.png
135 ms
apple-icon-120x120.png
136 ms
apple-icon-144x144.png
223 ms
apple-icon-152x152.png
225 ms
apple-icon-180x180.png
231 ms
android-icon-192x192.png
984 ms
favicon-32x32.png
219 ms
favicon-96x96.png
1992 ms
favicon-16x16.png
3005 ms
manifest.json
1988 ms
main.cd6c2e0c916225ec654d.css
3006 ms
runtime.747a31c13741ad0653eb.bundle.js
3003 ms
main.76486e86c4528bc5cacb.bundle.js
3028 ms
tl-bg-1.png
1022 ms
tl-bg-2.png
1016 ms
tl-bg-3.png
1019 ms
tl-bg-4.png
1024 ms
LU.svg
1024 ms
refresh.svg
1019 ms
FuturaPT-Heavy.woff
1136 ms
xattenger.com accessibility score
xattenger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
xattenger.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xattenger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xattenger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xattenger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xattenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: