2.2 sec in total
90 ms
2 sec
62 ms
Click here to check amazing Xenna content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xenna.com
Xenna Corporation | Clinically Proven Products for Skin, Scalp and Nails.
Visit xenna.comWe analyzed Xenna.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
xenna.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
90 ms
53 ms
51 ms
1180 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xenna.com, 40% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 515.8 kB (48%)
1.1 MB
551.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Xenna.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 516.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 412.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 412.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xenna needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 49.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (43%)
30
17
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xenna. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.xenna.com
90 ms
minified.js
53 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
51 ms
polyfill.min.js
1180 ms
widget.js
45 ms
thunderbolt-commons.f03a5fa7.bundle.min.js
71 ms
main.ceaab929.bundle.min.js
76 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
77 ms
lodash.min.js
76 ms
react.production.min.js
79 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
76 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
78 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
79 ms
Xenna.png
207 ms
f1037a_25f84a4c29124140bfdd750bc1bfc779~mv2.png
339 ms
Carol%20Buck%20Founder%20%26%20CEO.jpg
409 ms
Untitled.png
459 ms
f1037a_2dd74b78df3448888e66f98426c29ced~mv2.png
389 ms
f1037a_091ff0065be64b0dbf14faceddea6423~mv2.jpg
403 ms
download.png
407 ms
download-1.png
529 ms
download-1.png
578 ms
download.png
587 ms
download-2.png
589 ms
download-3.png
535 ms
bundle.min.js
102 ms
widget_app_base_1715342638247.js
187 ms
e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff
93 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
72 ms
9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
91 ms
ProximaNovaW05-Regular.woff
92 ms
119 ms
158 ms
155 ms
150 ms
152 ms
148 ms
151 ms
186 ms
183 ms
183 ms
178 ms
178 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
24 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
17 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
6 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
10 ms
xenna.com accessibility score
xenna.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xenna.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xenna.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xenna.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xenna.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xenna. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: