7.4 sec in total
760 ms
6.3 sec
396 ms
Welcome to xgoogle.co.za homepage info - get ready to check Xgoogle best content for South Africa right away, or after learning these important things about xgoogle.co.za
Latest Updates from News, Accidents, Robberies and Incidents
Visit xgoogle.co.zaWe analyzed Xgoogle.co.za page load time and found that the first response time was 760 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
xgoogle.co.za performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value25,860 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value38.1 s
0/100
10%
760 ms
358 ms
354 ms
383 ms
1095 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Xgoogle.co.za, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Nari.co.za.
Page size can be reduced by 114.8 kB (18%)
637.1 kB
522.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Xgoogle.co.za main page is 637.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 300.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xgoogle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xgoogle.co.za has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (68%)
69
22
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xgoogle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xgoogle.co.za
760 ms
css
358 ms
font-awesome.min.css
354 ms
37adb30d2f.js
383 ms
material-kit.css
1095 ms
demo.css
602 ms
core-set-overwrite.css
598 ms
adsbygoogle.js
304 ms
jquery.min.js
1045 ms
popper.min.js
562 ms
bootstrap-material-design.min.js
808 ms
moment.min.js
1442 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.js
1043 ms
nouislider.min.js
1044 ms
material-kit.js
1441 ms
zrt_lookup.html
29 ms
show_ads_impl.js
310 ms
nari_icon.jpg
2709 ms
new.png
594 ms
bull1111553914606.jpg
2709 ms
google_play2.png
1856 ms
sdk.js
245 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
128 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
349 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
351 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
355 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf
356 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaA.ttf
355 ms
sdk.js
167 ms
cookie.js
223 ms
integrator.js
201 ms
ads
856 ms
analytics.js
76 ms
ads
630 ms
collect
46 ms
collect
64 ms
reactive_library.js
107 ms
integrator.js
125 ms
ads
682 ms
zrt_lookup.html
110 ms
gm.png
301 ms
5865619286570400271
92 ms
abg_lite.js
145 ms
window_focus.js
182 ms
qs_click_protection.js
201 ms
rx_lidar.js
279 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
201 ms
css2
153 ms
shopping
255 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
226 ms
042791247ab671b2831aa311d6583330.js
464 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
208 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
514 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
516 ms
icon.png
121 ms
shopping
455 ms
s
71 ms
activeview
143 ms
css
71 ms
YrdBSjzfIHcYhYLmavhSyO_EhBrLUWpx5ykdL7H9Kqg.js
12 ms
ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pA.ttf
12 ms
ea8IacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVBg3etBD7SQ.ttf
12 ms
85254efcadaacab5fed344cbf203b7e7.js
8 ms
c471d9b7113df21a6cf58632ab968748.js
354 ms
cookie_push_onload.html
338 ms
css
59 ms
dpixel
723 ms
sodar
668 ms
activeview
657 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf
582 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf
582 ms
sodar2.js
107 ms
pixel
278 ms
runner.html
61 ms
aframe
235 ms
pixel
247 ms
pixel
231 ms
pixel
58 ms
pixel
28 ms
pixel
39 ms
xgoogle.co.za accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xgoogle.co.za best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xgoogle.co.za SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xgoogle.co.za can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xgoogle.co.za main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xgoogle.co.za
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xgoogle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: