2.4 sec in total
131 ms
1.2 sec
995 ms
Click here to check amazing Xpandable content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xpandable.online
A digital marketing agency in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and the USA. Over 20 years experience in Digital marketing in Lebanon, Dubai and the US.
Visit xpandable.onlineWe analyzed Xpandable.online page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
xpandable.online performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
76/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
131 ms
134 ms
51 ms
133 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Xpandable.online, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) belongs to the original domain Xpandable.online.
Page size can be reduced by 316.7 kB (14%)
2.3 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Xpandable.online main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 265.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xpandable needs image optimization as it can save up to 265.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xpandable.online has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (28%)
90
65
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xpandable. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xpandable.online
131 ms
mm_5f414ad5-159c-4120-805f-d31f350ac82b-46828461.js
134 ms
api.js
51 ms
js
133 ms
anime.min.js
70 ms
js
138 ms
style.css
61 ms
outside.css
173 ms
outside2.css
179 ms
font.css
132 ms
css
60 ms
all.css
64 ms
carousel.css
136 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
208 ms
jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js
133 ms
popper.min.js
129 ms
bootstrap.min.js
51 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
272 ms
wow.min.js
273 ms
scripts.js
273 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
modernizr.js
128 ms
recaptcha__en.js
28 ms
spinner.svg
202 ms
xpandable.png
204 ms
whatsapp.png
306 ms
bch.jpg
422 ms
frame.png
175 ms
quality%20(1).png
262 ms
pc.png
176 ms
marketing.png
176 ms
location.png
262 ms
grow-up.png
262 ms
professional-services.png
261 ms
LAMP.png
290 ms
us.png
290 ms
lb.png
290 ms
saudi-arabia.png
299 ms
uae.png
269 ms
p11.png
334 ms
p22.png
337 ms
p33.png
341 ms
star.png
458 ms
60.svg
344 ms
59.svg
382 ms
1.svg
391 ms
2.svg
395 ms
3.svg
396 ms
4.svg
438 ms
5.svg
448 ms
6.svg
452 ms
7.svg
456 ms
8.svg
479 ms
9.svg
495 ms
10.svg
489 ms
js
149 ms
analytics.js
146 ms
207 ms
11.svg
442 ms
12.svg
446 ms
13.svg
447 ms
14.svg
467 ms
Angular.png
481 ms
React.png
387 ms
Vue.png
391 ms
Net.png
396 ms
Php.png
398 ms
Python.png
419 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
90 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
107 ms
fallback
101 ms
collect
30 ms
Node.png
350 ms
Ruby.png
357 ms
Golang.png
361 ms
c++.png
359 ms
Java.png
359 ms
30 ms
rust.png
363 ms
Android.png
379 ms
Flutter.png
378 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
ios.png
378 ms
css
18 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
5 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
7 ms
back8.jpg
452 ms
facebook1.png
348 ms
google.jpg
371 ms
facebook.jpg
380 ms
microsoft.jpg
350 ms
linkedin.png
339 ms
fb.webp
344 ms
yt.png
370 ms
in.png
469 ms
xpandable.online accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
xpandable.online best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xpandable.online SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xpandable.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xpandable.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xpandable.online
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xpandable. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: