Tools & Wizards About Us
xtpark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

xtpark.com

Xtreme Trampoline Park | Come Experience Wicked Fun!

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

971 ms

Page Rendered

57 ms

xtpark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xtpark.com homepage info - get ready to check Xt Park best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about xtpark.com

Welcome to the newest and best Trampoline Park in Eastern Ontario! Xtreme Trampoline is dedicated to delivering AWESOME! Off the wall fun, Literally!

Visit xtpark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xtpark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xtpark.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.xtpark.com

71 ms

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

71 ms

snippet.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xtpark.com, 31% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (14 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 809.3 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

554.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Xtpark.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 780.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 612.3 kB

  • Original 780.6 kB
  • After minification 778.7 kB
  • After compression 168.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 612.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 137.3 kB
  • After minification 122.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xt Park needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 182.3 kB

  • Original 445.5 kB
  • After minification 445.5 kB
  • After compression 263.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.3 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (37%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xt Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.xtpark.com

www.xtpark.com

71 ms

minified.js

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

71 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

70 ms

thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js

115 ms

main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js

main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js

131 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

118 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

118 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

130 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

132 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

131 ms

86e2ac_b8540655d224410ea22825be1da20631~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_b8540655d224410ea22825be1da20631~mv2.jpg

251 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

54 ms

86e2ac_77a4974261db4e05b98b4e6de5c49fd9.png

86e2ac_77a4974261db4e05b98b4e6de5c49fd9.png

356 ms

86e2ac_0775b5d01d3b4eaf8878fb81084590be~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_0775b5d01d3b4eaf8878fb81084590be~mv2.jpg

389 ms

86e2ac_5cc89b26d383424483597dc3a0674348~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_5cc89b26d383424483597dc3a0674348~mv2.jpg

348 ms

86e2ac_e0520abe5d9b4b64bd23e97b711ab78b~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_e0520abe5d9b4b64bd23e97b711ab78b~mv2.jpg

372 ms

86e2ac_b8540655d224410ea22825be1da20631~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_b8540655d224410ea22825be1da20631~mv2.jpg

316 ms

86e2ac_9aaa5f9d2e2243539d0cb459a7e2e04a~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_9aaa5f9d2e2243539d0cb459a7e2e04a~mv2.jpg

319 ms

86e2ac_aab7320080de43d6acae95765b05b61f~mv2.jpg

86e2ac_aab7320080de43d6acae95765b05b61f~mv2.jpg

541 ms

86e2ac_3718bc46e097428e91c1d87fb8570db9.jpg

86e2ac_3718bc46e097428e91c1d87fb8570db9.jpg

590 ms

86e2ac_934b5bfa53e4438196fac439f36f729e~mv2_d_4458_2936_s_4_2.jpg

86e2ac_934b5bfa53e4438196fac439f36f729e~mv2_d_4458_2936_s_4_2.jpg

510 ms

86e2ac_a60da9fdac4d467493a8d7c576dc4930.jpg

86e2ac_a60da9fdac4d467493a8d7c576dc4930.jpg

532 ms

86e2ac_7298d1595b894b5590af1664a4db8e22.png

86e2ac_7298d1595b894b5590af1664a4db8e22.png

603 ms

IATP.png

IATP.png

656 ms

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

18 ms

104 ms

100 ms

98 ms

97 ms

92 ms

94 ms

137 ms

134 ms

134 ms

133 ms

132 ms

129 ms

file.woff

file.woff

359 ms

80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff

80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff

4 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

29 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

xtpark.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

xtpark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xtpark.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xtpark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xtpark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xtpark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xt Park. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: