Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

yurtcamp.co.uk

Wedding Festival Venue | Yurtcamp Devon & Dartmoor

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

88 ms

yurtcamp.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to yurtcamp.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Yurtcamp best content right away, or after learning these important things about yurtcamp.co.uk

Welcome to Yurtcamp Devon, the premier outdoor wedding venue nestled within 40 acres of beautiful woodland. Our luxurious yurts, charming Wedding Barn, and majestic Norwegian Giant Tipi offer a unique...

Visit yurtcamp.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Yurtcamp.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

yurtcamp.co.uk performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,620 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

yurtcamp.co.uk

43 ms

yurtcamp.co.uk

119 ms

www.yurtcamp.co.uk

39 ms

www.yurtcamp.co.uk

207 ms

base.min.css

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 156 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Yurtcamp.co.uk, 55% (86 requests) were made to Bestdevonholidays.co.uk and 17% (26 requests) were made to Images8.design-editor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (955 ms) relates to the external source Images8.design-editor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Yurtcamp.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 98.9 kB

  • Original 114.3 kB
  • After minification 113.0 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 78.3 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Yurtcamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 306.6 kB
  • After minification 306.6 kB
  • After compression 287.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 43.3 kB

  • Original 193.6 kB
  • After minification 193.6 kB
  • After compression 150.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yurtcamp.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (45%)

Requests Now

148

After Optimization

81

The browser has sent 148 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yurtcamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

yurtcamp.co.uk accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

yurtcamp.co.uk best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

yurtcamp.co.uk SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yurtcamp.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Yurtcamp.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Yurtcamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: