Tools & Wizards About Us
aesthetique.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

aesthetique.com

Plastic, Cosmetic Surgery CT - Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

465 ms

aesthetique.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aesthetique content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aesthetique.com

Plastic Surgeon Southbury, CT - Specializing in Breast Augmentation, Liposuction, Facelift, Eyelid Lift, Forehead Lift, Nose Surgery, Botox

Visit aesthetique.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aesthetique.com page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aesthetique.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aesthetique.com

200 ms

www.aesthetique.com

239 ms

www.aesthetique.com

345 ms

style.min.css

21 ms

style.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Aesthetique.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pumc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (588 ms) relates to the external source Pumc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

802.5 kB

After Optimization

635.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aesthetique.com main page is 802.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 229.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 155.8 kB

  • Original 192.5 kB
  • After minification 190.0 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 212.7 kB
  • After minification 212.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aesthetique images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 453 B

  • Original 229.2 kB
  • After minification 229.2 kB
  • After compression 228.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 168.2 kB
  • After minification 167.5 kB
  • After compression 157.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aesthetique.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (74%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aesthetique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aesthetique.com

aesthetique.com

200 ms

www.aesthetique.com

www.aesthetique.com

239 ms

www.aesthetique.com

www.aesthetique.com

345 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

21 ms

style.css

style.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

30 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

46 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

36 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

40 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

56 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

56 ms

style.css

style.css

60 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

58 ms

minimal.css

minimal.css

63 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

64 ms

fa-solid.min.css

fa-solid.min.css

63 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

82 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

66 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

72 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

68 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

70 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

78 ms

custom.css

custom.css

87 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

100 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

100 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

232 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

336 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

233 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

329 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

231 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

328 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

334 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

363 ms

css

css

45 ms

jquery.hoverdir.min.js

jquery.hoverdir.min.js

363 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

351 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

350 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

349 ms

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js

348 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

346 ms

birdeye.php

birdeye.php

588 ms

422929393

422929393

456 ms

logo.png

logo.png

345 ms

gmb-sprite.png

gmb-sprite.png

351 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

345 ms

leaf-sm.png

leaf-sm.png

351 ms

announcement-box.jpg

announcement-box.jpg

345 ms

icon-testimonials.png

icon-testimonials.png

350 ms

icon-gallery.png

icon-gallery.png

350 ms

icon-specials.png

icon-specials.png

349 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

351 ms

southbury-map-sm.jpg

southbury-map-sm.jpg

393 ms

waterbury-map-sm.jpg

waterbury-map-sm.jpg

393 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMZhKQ.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMZhKQ.woff

347 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKQ.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKQ.woff

360 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQbMZhKQ.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQbMZhKQ.woff

388 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMZhKQ.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMZhKQ.woff

410 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMZhKQ.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMZhKQ.woff

411 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

411 ms

Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCT6oJRLSzu.woff

Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCT6oJRLSzu.woff

411 ms

Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCTtIJRLSzu.woff

Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCTtIJRLSzu.woff

411 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

386 ms

api.js

api.js

10 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

15 ms

birdeye.css

birdeye.css

23 ms

star-rating-sprite.png

star-rating-sprite.png

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

194 ms

Accessibility Review

aesthetique.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

aesthetique.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

aesthetique.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aesthetique.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aesthetique.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aesthetique.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aesthetique. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: