Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

app.expresstext.net

SMS Marketing Campaigns | Web Based | Mobile Advertising | Bulk SMS

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

About Website

Welcome to app.expresstext.net homepage info - get ready to check App Expresstext best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about app.expresstext.net

Get started with SMS Marketing in Minutes. Get the highest ROI, with the best SMS Marketing software in the Industry. Free to Register. Just Pay as You Go.

Visit app.expresstext.net

Key Findings

We analyzed App.expresstext.net page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

app.expresstext.net performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

app.expresstext.net

53 ms

app.expresstext.net

71 ms

gtm.js

107 ms

hotjar-1628294.js

137 ms

css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original App.expresstext.net, 31% (40 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) belongs to the original domain App.expresstext.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

183.1 kB

After Optimization

151.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of App.expresstext.net main page is 183.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 71.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. App Expresstext images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 278 B

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 71.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (61%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of App Expresstext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

app.expresstext.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

app.expresstext.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

app.expresstext.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise App.expresstext.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that App.expresstext.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of App Expresstext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: