Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

interdic.net

InterDic A-C Diccionario de Internet en Español. Especializado en acrónimos

Page Load Speed

497 ms in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

311 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

About Website

Welcome to interdic.net homepage info - get ready to check Inter Dic best content right away, or after learning these important things about interdic.net

Informática en Internet. Diccionario de Internet especializado en acrónimos

Visit interdic.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Interdic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 381 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interdic.net performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interdic.net

116 ms

www.interdic.net

113 ms

engine_html

7 ms

anunciospatrocinados.js

33 ms

logointerdic.jpg

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Interdic.net, 9% (1 request) were made to Mercadoenlacestexto.com and 9% (1 request) were made to De.anunciospatrocinados.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (116 ms) belongs to the original domain Interdic.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

46.2 kB

After Optimization

42.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Interdic.net main page is 46.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 23.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inter Dic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inter Dic. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

interdic.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

interdic.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

interdic.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interdic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Interdic.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inter Dic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: