Access natalieogura.com. N A T A L I E O G U R A

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

www.natalieogura.com

101 ms

i2tnD5yEtWNsAphgilFAoN3X_48GNa4Icoh5Z6chnFMfenIIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9kFcByFRS3ZQsKw26kFAsKZRmcZQsqwg7BMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0dcBXjAUTZPuzZamkjPoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCHKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOeBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOeBDOcu8OeUzjhBC-eNDifU0jWsyde88OAN1iW4yO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPU0jWsyde88dhiuScI0jhNlOYFUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUaiaS0jWw0dA9CiaiaOcoyieBC-A9ldhiuScI0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaiko0jWsyde88dhiuScI0jhNlOYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicI7fbKnMsMMeMI6MKG4f5J7IMMjMkMfH6qJn3IbMg6IJMJ7f6K3UMIbMg6BJMJ7fbKlMsMMeMj6MKG4fJCgIMMjgkMfH6qJ7bIbMg6JJMJ7fbK4MsMMeMq6MKG4fOMgIMMj2KMfH6qJRMIbMg6sJMHbM--RaLXB.js

137 ms

css2

77 ms

legacy.js

26 ms

modern.js

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Natalieogura.com, 65% (59 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 12% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Natalieogura.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 108.1 kB

Original 129.6 kB
After minification 122.0 kB
After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

Original 980.6 kB
After minification 946.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. N A T L I E O G U R images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

Original 2.6 MB
After minification 2.6 MB
After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of N A T L I E O G U R. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.