Access textalk.com. Textalk – E-newspapers, e-commerce, and web shops for everyone

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

37/100

10%

textalk.com

325 ms

en

1126 ms

notices.css

306 ms

langswitcher.css

306 ms

glightbox.min.css

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Textalk.com, 90% (19 requests) were made to Textalk.se and 5% (1 request) were made to Plausible.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Textalk.se.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Textalk.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

Original 57.8 kB
After minification 50.5 kB
After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 62.9 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 960.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textalk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 39 B

Original 127.2 kB
After minification 127.2 kB
After compression 127.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 317 B

Original 18.3 kB
After minification 18.3 kB
After compression 18.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textalk.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.