2.6 sec in total
502 ms
1.8 sec
360 ms
Visit chisholmtech.com now to see the best up-to-date Chisholm Tech content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chisholmtech.com
We are a Sofware and Engineering Consulting Company offering website development, software application development, and electrical engineering drafting/design
Visit chisholmtech.comWe analyzed Chisholmtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 502 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
chisholmtech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.56
12/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
502 ms
22 ms
305 ms
160 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Chisholmtech.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) belongs to the original domain Chisholmtech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 868.7 kB (41%)
2.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Chisholmtech.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chisholm Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 304.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 469.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chisholmtech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 469.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (42%)
64
37
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chisholm Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chisholmtech.com
502 ms
css
22 ms
bootstrap.min.css
305 ms
style.css
160 ms
header-v5.css
158 ms
footer-v1.css
109 ms
animate.css
255 ms
line-icons.css
144 ms
font-awesome.min.css
212 ms
owl.carousel.css
196 ms
settings.css
353 ms
cti-colors.css
265 ms
custom.css
246 ms
logo.gif
260 ms
swbg1.jpg
361 ms
swbg5.jpg
362 ms
edbg1.jpg
563 ms
jquery.min.js
428 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
307 ms
bootstrap.min.js
356 ms
back-to-top.js
364 ms
smoothScroll.js
411 ms
jquery.parallax.js
411 ms
owl.carousel.js
413 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
509 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
555 ms
custom.js
465 ms
app.js
463 ms
owl-carousel.js
479 ms
revolution-slider.js
518 ms
img3.jpg
621 ms
img4.jpg
629 ms
img5.jpg
700 ms
img12.jpg
567 ms
img1.jpg
608 ms
img6.jpg
605 ms
php-logo.png
620 ms
java-logo.png
622 ms
logo_asp.net_201.png
604 ms
c.png
575 ms
perl.png
579 ms
ie8.css
568 ms
blocks.css
565 ms
plugins.css
551 ms
app.css
567 ms
style-switcher.css
763 ms
drupal.png
526 ms
html5.png
531 ms
css.png
504 ms
zend.png
468 ms
js.png
481 ms
jquery.png
448 ms
autocad.png
463 ms
revit.png
466 ms
chisholm-tech-banner-dark2.jpg
458 ms
ctshort.jpg
71 ms
facebook.png
69 ms
twitter.png
71 ms
timer.png
69 ms
breadcrumbs.png
69 ms
title-decoration.png
70 ms
collage.jpg
156 ms
gridtile.png
156 ms
map-img.png
332 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
107 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVc.ttf
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4kaVc.ttf
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4kaVc.ttf
87 ms
loader.gif
54 ms
revicons.woff
53 ms
chisholmtech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chisholmtech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chisholmtech.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chisholmtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chisholmtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chisholmtech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chisholm Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: