1.7 sec in total
55 ms
878 ms
717 ms
Click here to check amazing Count On That content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about countonthat.com
Visit countonthat.comWe analyzed Countonthat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
countonthat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value3,740 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.65
9/100
15%
Value32.4 s
0/100
10%
55 ms
48 ms
23 ms
31 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Countonthat.com, 12% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (406 ms) belongs to the original domain Countonthat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 130.9 kB (3%)
4.1 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Countonthat.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Count On That images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Countonthat.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (86%)
91
13
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Count On That. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 48 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
countonthat.com
55 ms
countonthat.com
48 ms
bdt-uikit.css
23 ms
ep-helper.css
31 ms
premium-addons.min.css
38 ms
main.css
59 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
57 ms
frontend.min.css
54 ms
swiper.min.css
51 ms
e-swiper.min.css
55 ms
post-104.css
73 ms
frontend.min.css
65 ms
animations.min.css
72 ms
post-115.css
75 ms
all.min.css
87 ms
v4-shims.min.css
76 ms
style.css
78 ms
text-editor.css
96 ms
style.min.css
95 ms
theme.min.css
104 ms
header-footer.min.css
93 ms
post-41.css
99 ms
post-219.css
122 ms
ekiticons.css
114 ms
widget-styles.css
127 ms
responsive.css
153 ms
css
48 ms
fontawesome.min.css
141 ms
regular.min.css
144 ms
jkiticon.css
145 ms
brands.min.css
151 ms
solid.min.css
166 ms
v4-shims.min.js
149 ms
jquery.min.js
159 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
162 ms
js
76 ms
email-decode.min.js
147 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
259 ms
api.js
45 ms
widget-image.min.css
257 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
242 ms
widget-heading.min.css
236 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
214 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
218 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
218 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
212 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
207 ms
widget-counter.min.css
205 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
208 ms
widget-forms.min.css
198 ms
flatpickr.min.css
202 ms
widget-video.min.css
199 ms
widget-blockquote.min.css
199 ms
post-281.css
264 ms
post-299.css
189 ms
post-288.css
184 ms
cute-alert.js
184 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
184 ms
frontend-script.js
179 ms
widget-scripts.js
176 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
216 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
213 ms
core.min.js
192 ms
frontend.min.js
196 ms
sticky-element.js
238 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
191 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
190 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
236 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
323 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
321 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
315 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
312 ms
helper.min.js
312 ms
gtm.js
85 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
129 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
217 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
246 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
247 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
246 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
247 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
216 ms
hooks.min.js
287 ms
i18n.min.js
285 ms
frontend.min.js
284 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
284 ms
animate-circle.min.js
283 ms
elementor.js
282 ms
1-1.png
383 ms
Steve-Kipp.jpg
391 ms
Futurism-Background-23.jpg
384 ms
6.jpg
280 ms
Steve-Kipp-2.jpg
279 ms
5.jpg
380 ms
Untitled-design-2022-11-15T233951.214.png
378 ms
Screenshot-2022-08-19-at-5.49.38-AM-e1660859534766.png
382 ms
Steve-Kipp-1.jpg
379 ms
3-1.png
384 ms
quickbooks-pro-advisor.jpeg
376 ms
jkiticon.woff
324 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
327 ms
eicons.woff
327 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
326 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
406 ms
elementskit.woff
374 ms
kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf
171 ms
kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY3KcU.ttf
170 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
212 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
208 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
212 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
211 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
212 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
212 ms
recaptcha__en.js
75 ms
countonthat.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
countonthat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
countonthat.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Countonthat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Countonthat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
countonthat.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Count On That. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: