Tools & Wizards About Us
dyam.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

dyam.net

Dyam.com | Paul C. Smith, Janet Lambert Smith Design Team

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

430 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

103 ms

dyam.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dyam.net homepage info - get ready to check Dyam best content right away, or after learning these important things about dyam.net

New York design team creates dynamic graphic solutions tailored to your unique advertising needs since 1985.

Visit dyam.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Dyam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dyam.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dyam.net

430 ms

content.css

10 ms

rokbox.css

13 ms

nucleus.css

11 ms

galatea_75.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Dyam.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org and 3% (1 request) were made to Hitsteps.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Dyam.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 920.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dyam.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 855.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 855.0 kB
  • After minification 842.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dyam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 565.4 kB

  • Original 795.6 kB
  • After minification 682.3 kB
  • After compression 230.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 565.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 317.5 kB

  • Original 368.7 kB
  • After minification 318.9 kB
  • After compression 51.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dyam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 317.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (66%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dyam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dyam.net

dyam.net

430 ms

content.css

content.css

10 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

13 ms

nucleus.css

nucleus.css

11 ms

galatea_75.css

galatea_75.css

18 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

13 ms

galatea-joomla_75.css

galatea-joomla_75.css

15 ms

custom_75.css

custom_75.css

12 ms

animate.css

animate.css

23 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

28 ms

core.js

core.js

16 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

41 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

26 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

39 ms

widget.js

widget.js

178 ms

main.js

main.js

64 ms

owlcarousel.js

owlcarousel.js

75 ms

mosaicgrid.js

mosaicgrid.js

75 ms

Dyam_Logo_420.png

Dyam_Logo_420.png

8 ms

Dyam_Ideas_Become_Reality.jpg

Dyam_Ideas_Become_Reality.jpg

12 ms

Dyam_Vivid_Clarity.jpg

Dyam_Vivid_Clarity.jpg

24 ms

Dyam_Crafting_Concepts.jpg

Dyam_Crafting_Concepts.jpg

9 ms

Dyam_Trees_for_the_Woods.jpg

Dyam_Trees_for_the_Woods.jpg

17 ms

Dyam_Web_Design.jpg

Dyam_Web_Design.jpg

8 ms

Artistic_Engraving.jpg

Artistic_Engraving.jpg

16 ms

Graphic_Design.jpg

Graphic_Design.jpg

15 ms

track.php

track.php

403 ms

widget_app_base_1726651421361.js

widget_app_base_1726651421361.js

24 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

28 ms

muli-regular-webfont.woff

muli-regular-webfont.woff

19 ms

muli-light-webfont.woff

muli-light-webfont.woff

27 ms

hind-regular-webfont.woff

hind-regular-webfont.woff

16 ms

hind-medium-webfont.woff

hind-medium-webfont.woff

19 ms

hind-light-webfont.woff

hind-light-webfont.woff

18 ms

hind-semibold-webfont.woff

hind-semibold-webfont.woff

28 ms

hind-bold-webfont.woff

hind-bold-webfont.woff

27 ms

Accessibility Review

dyam.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dyam.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dyam.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dyam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dyam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dyam.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dyam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: