Tools & Wizards About Us
energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

64 ms

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Energy Storagesystemseurope2022 Tech Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,400 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

133 ms

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

521 ms

bootstrap.css

317 ms

font-awesome.min.css

266 ms

animate.css

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com, 49% (27 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 269.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

883.7 kB

After Optimization

614.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com main page is 883.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 750.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 18.2 kB
  • After minification 14.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energy Storagesystemseurope2022 Tech Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 205.9 kB

  • Original 750.7 kB
  • After minification 750.7 kB
  • After compression 544.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 53.2 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (76%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energy Storagesystemseurope2022 Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

133 ms

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

521 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

317 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

266 ms

animate.css

animate.css

264 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

268 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

267 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

277 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

323 ms

style1.css

style1.css

127 ms

main.css

main.css

323 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

327 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

329 ms

css

css

78 ms

css

css

88 ms

css

css

94 ms

js

js

92 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

129 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

149 ms

element.js

element.js

81 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

441 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

504 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

502 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

503 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

503 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

503 ms

main.js

main.js

503 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

647 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

647 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

647 ms

custom.js

custom.js

647 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

646 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

186 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

186 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

153 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

156 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

156 ms

load.gif

load.gif

301 ms

x.png

x.png

327 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

131 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

284 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

212 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

155 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

163 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

164 ms

css

css

134 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

151 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

142 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

140 ms

collect

collect

115 ms

ads

ads

150 ms

container.html

container.html

38 ms

js

js

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

98 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

94 ms

Accessibility Review

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energy-storage-systems-europe-2022.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energy Storagesystemseurope2022 Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: