6.2 sec in total
606 ms
5.1 sec
457 ms
Visit foodapp.in now to see the best up-to-date Food App content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodapp.in
We provide food delivery website and app development solution for food delivery startups and restaurant businesses. You can launch your own Food Delivery Service within 24 hours, if you want.
Visit foodapp.inWe analyzed Foodapp.in page load time and found that the first response time was 606 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
foodapp.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.237
53/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
606 ms
991 ms
580 ms
16 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Foodapp.in, 15% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Foodapp.in.
Page size can be reduced by 331.4 kB (9%)
3.8 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodapp.in main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.1 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Food App images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 206.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodapp.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 206.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (44%)
72
40
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Food App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodapp.in
606 ms
foodapp.in
991 ms
bannerscollection_zoominout.css
580 ms
css
16 ms
css
29 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
19 ms
font-awesome.css
788 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1191 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
795 ms
templatemo-style.css
822 ms
gallery.css
618 ms
jquery.min.js
15 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
21 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
772 ms
bannerscollection_zoominout.js
1029 ms
font-awesome.min.css
36 ms
gallery.flexisel.js
778 ms
all.js
218 ms
font.css
197 ms
css
30 ms
css
43 ms
css
49 ms
css
50 ms
css
19 ms
logo.png
196 ms
phone.png
199 ms
loader.gif
200 ms
01_opportune.jpg
788 ms
02_opportune.jpg
1240 ms
03_opportune.jpg
1239 ms
04_opportune.jpg
964 ms
hand.png
798 ms
line.png
399 ms
img.jpg
994 ms
img1.jpg
986 ms
img2.jpg
1587 ms
food_bg.jpg
1162 ms
google.png
1184 ms
app.png
1194 ms
food_bg1.jpg
1358 ms
food_bg2.jpg
1381 ms
icon.png
1393 ms
icon1.png
1444 ms
icon2.png
1444 ms
icon3.png
1554 ms
phone1.png
1579 ms
food_bg3.jpg
1791 ms
line2.png
1649 ms
live-demo.png
1650 ms
icon4.png
1748 ms
icon5.png
1777 ms
icon6.png
1785 ms
line1.png
1856 ms
icon7.png
1856 ms
testi.png
1943 ms
line1.jpg
1972 ms
default
202 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
24 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
31 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
40 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
50 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1924 ms
leftNavOFF.png
1930 ms
rightNavOFF.png
1999 ms
play_overOFF.png
2000 ms
bottomNavOFF.png
1956 ms
textBg_transparency.png
1375 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
9 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
16 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
19 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
52 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
62 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
222 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
63 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
202 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
187 ms
twk-main.js
100 ms
twk-vendor.js
165 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
215 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
232 ms
twk-runtime.js
223 ms
twk-app.js
282 ms
prev1.png
196 ms
next1.png
202 ms
foodapp.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foodapp.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
foodapp.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodapp.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Foodapp.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodapp.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Food App. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: