Tools & Wizards About Us
healthadvocacy.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

healthadvocacy.org

Health Advocacy UK - Continuing Healthcare Advocacy - Care Pathway

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

459 ms

healthadvocacy.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to healthadvocacy.org homepage info - get ready to check Health Advocacy best content right away, or after learning these important things about healthadvocacy.org

We specialise in Continuing Healthcare Advocacy. We can assist you from initial enquiry throughout the assessment process and also through to dispute if required. This allows us to support our clients...

Visit healthadvocacy.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Healthadvocacy.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

healthadvocacy.org performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.healthadvocacy.org

1367 ms

analytics.js

48 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

style.min.css

289 ms

css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Healthadvocacy.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Healthadvocacy.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Healthadvocacy.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 110.9 kB

  • Original 131.7 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 50.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 974.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Health Advocacy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 432.5 kB
  • After minification 432.5 kB
  • After compression 431.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 774 B

  • Original 99.4 kB
  • After minification 99.4 kB
  • After compression 98.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Healthadvocacy.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (80%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Health Advocacy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.healthadvocacy.org

www.healthadvocacy.org

1367 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

48 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

289 ms

css

css

52 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

280 ms

contact-form-7.min.css

contact-form-7.min.css

278 ms

wp-accessibility-helper.min.css

wp-accessibility-helper.min.css

286 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

293 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

324 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

465 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

481 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

380 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

390 ms

global.css

global.css

1349 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

1354 ms

post-1911.css

post-1911.css

1536 ms

css

css

93 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

497 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

558 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

576 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

600 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

746 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

671 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

704 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

79 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

709 ms

wp-accessibility-helper.min.js

wp-accessibility-helper.min.js

751 ms

api.js

api.js

35 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

782 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

821 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

854 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

880 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

916 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

962 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

979 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1012 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1066 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1082 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1108 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1181 ms

HEALTH-ADVOCACY-UK-8.png

HEALTH-ADVOCACY-UK-8.png

136 ms

sUPPORT4-1.png

sUPPORT4-1.png

675 ms

Carehome-Pathway-1024x683-1024x683.jpg

Carehome-Pathway-1024x683-1024x683.jpg

218 ms

Logo-74x70.png

Logo-74x70.png

663 ms

ShropshireChamberMemberLogo-1.jpg

ShropshireChamberMemberLogo-1.jpg

840 ms

accessibility-48.jpg

accessibility-48.jpg

761 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

48 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

976 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

815 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

814 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

674 ms

recaptcha__en_gb.js

recaptcha__en_gb.js

457 ms

frontend-msie.min.css

frontend-msie.min.css

519 ms

Accessibility Review

healthadvocacy.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

healthadvocacy.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

healthadvocacy.org SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Healthadvocacy.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Healthadvocacy.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

healthadvocacy.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Health Advocacy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: