5.3 sec in total
900 ms
3.8 sec
553 ms
Welcome to integritysafety.net homepage info - get ready to check Integrity Safety best content right away, or after learning these important things about integritysafety.net
If you are looking for transportation safety services in Texas, we are the best transportation DOT Safety Consultants to guide you in preparing for DOT and FMCSA compliance requirements. Contact us no...
Visit integritysafety.netWe analyzed Integritysafety.net page load time and found that the first response time was 900 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
integritysafety.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.231
54/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
900 ms
108 ms
167 ms
163 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Integritysafety.net, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (900 ms) belongs to the original domain Integritysafety.net.
Page size can be reduced by 192.8 kB (9%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Integritysafety.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Integrity Safety images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 73.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Integritysafety.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (79%)
76
16
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integrity Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.integritysafety.net
900 ms
frontend.min.css
108 ms
post-21.css
167 ms
post-22.css
163 ms
style.min.css
164 ms
theme.min.css
164 ms
header-footer.min.css
165 ms
post-5.css
164 ms
ekiticons.css
224 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
220 ms
swiper.min.css
219 ms
e-swiper.min.css
218 ms
frontend.min.css
280 ms
global.css
221 ms
animations.min.css
278 ms
post-10.css
275 ms
widget-styles.css
339 ms
responsive.css
277 ms
css
33 ms
fontawesome.min.css
287 ms
solid.min.css
330 ms
brands.min.css
331 ms
regular.min.css
331 ms
jquery.min.js
357 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
336 ms
js
73 ms
addthis_widget.js
20 ms
widget-image.min.css
427 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
427 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
426 ms
apple-webkit.min.css
428 ms
widget-heading.min.css
428 ms
widget-divider.min.css
429 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
430 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
429 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
465 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
431 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
430 ms
frontend-script.js
431 ms
widget-scripts.js
555 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
419 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
366 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
365 ms
hooks.min.js
363 ms
i18n.min.js
397 ms
frontend.min.js
412 ms
core.min.js
415 ms
frontend.min.js
362 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
360 ms
animate-circle.min.js
397 ms
elementor.js
395 ms
underscore.min.js
394 ms
wp-util.min.js
348 ms
frontend.min.js
350 ms
wpforms.min.js
385 ms
custom-captcha.min.js
382 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
381 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
401 ms
mailcheck.min.js
345 ms
punycode.min.js
350 ms
utils.min.js
383 ms
wpforms-modern.min.js
368 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
Group-44.png
253 ms
image-26-1-1.png
258 ms
logo.png
275 ms
Group-6-1-1.jpg
358 ms
shutterstock_117623971.jpg
413 ms
Fotolia_45698486_X.jpg
463 ms
shutterstock_691742317.jpg
367 ms
shutterstock_748195210.jpg
467 ms
shutterstock_528660739-1.png
320 ms
shutterstock_336055757.jpg
440 ms
Fotolia_543601_X.jpg
518 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
403 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
35 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
54 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
55 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
74 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
74 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
75 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
74 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
75 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
421 ms
elementskit.woff
490 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
443 ms
submit-spin.svg
469 ms
image-28.png
466 ms
image-27.png
428 ms
integritysafety.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
integritysafety.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
integritysafety.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integritysafety.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Integritysafety.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
integritysafety.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Integrity Safety. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: