1.8 sec in total
142 ms
1.4 sec
243 ms
Visit juliafem.org now to see the best up-to-date JuliaFEM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about juliafem.org
The JuliaFEM project develops open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed Finite Element Method.
Visit juliafem.orgWe analyzed Juliafem.org page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
juliafem.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
142 ms
152 ms
44 ms
13 ms
310 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Juliafem.org, 23% (22 requests) were made to Img.shields.io and 23% (22 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Img.shields.io.
Page size can be reduced by 74.6 kB (64%)
116.9 kB
42.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Juliafem.org main page is 116.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 79.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.6 kB, which is 60% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 471 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JuliaFEM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JuliaFEM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
juliafem.org
142 ms
www.juliafem.org
152 ms
main.css
44 ms
JuliaFEMLogo_96x96.png
13 ms
JuliaFEM.jl.svg
310 ms
TetGen.jl.svg
447 ms
Miniball.jl.svg
508 ms
CalculiX-cmake.svg
510 ms
CalculiX.jl.svg
462 ms
NodeNumbering.jl.svg
485 ms
AbaqusReader.jl.svg
436 ms
Materials.jl.svg
570 ms
AsterReader.jl.svg
581 ms
FEMQuad.jl.svg
624 ms
PkgTestSuite.jl.svg
636 ms
Mortar2D.jl.svg
672 ms
juliafem.github.io.svg
646 ms
FEMSparse.jl.svg
729 ms
FEMBasis.jl.svg
718 ms
ModelReduction.jl.svg
763 ms
OptoMechanics.jl.svg
1078 ms
METADATA.jl.svg
765 ms
Xdmf.jl.svg
903 ms
FEModels.svg
1070 ms
FEModels.jl.svg
868 ms
Mortar3D.jl.svg
891 ms
badge.svg
180 ms
badge.svg
182 ms
badge.svg
179 ms
badge.svg
180 ms
badge.svg
184 ms
badge.svg
180 ms
badge.svg
181 ms
badge.svg
188 ms
badge.svg
182 ms
badge.svg
189 ms
badge.svg
192 ms
badge.svg
187 ms
badge.svg
197 ms
badge.svg
218 ms
badge.svg
198 ms
badge.svg
224 ms
badge.svg
215 ms
badge.svg
218 ms
badge.svg
219 ms
badge.svg
221 ms
minima-social-icons.svg
20 ms
JuliaFEMLogo_96x96.png
65 ms
GitHub_Logo.png
26 ms
JuliaFEM_0.6.svg
83 ms
TetGen_0.6.svg
84 ms
Miniball_0.6.svg
83 ms
CalculiX-cmake_0.6.svg
83 ms
NodeNumbering_0.6.svg
81 ms
AbaqusReader_0.6.svg
85 ms
CalculiX_0.6.svg
85 ms
Materials_0.6.svg
147 ms
AsterReader_0.6.svg
144 ms
FEMQuad_0.6.svg
145 ms
Mortar2D_0.6.svg
142 ms
PkgTestSuite_0.6.svg
145 ms
analytics.js
65 ms
juliafem.github.io_0.6.svg
128 ms
FEMBasis_0.6.svg
106 ms
FEMSparse_0.6.svg
105 ms
ModelReduction_0.6.svg
78 ms
METADATA_0.6.svg
77 ms
OptoMechanics_0.6.svg
77 ms
coveralls_45.svg
85 ms
Xdmf_0.6.svg
74 ms
Mortar3D_0.6.svg
71 ms
FEModels_0.6.svg
69 ms
collect
30 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
16 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
38 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
42 ms
coveralls_94.svg
47 ms
coveralls_97.svg
32 ms
coveralls_99.svg
43 ms
coveralls_76.svg
40 ms
coveralls_100.svg
47 ms
coveralls_99.svg
50 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
51 ms
coveralls_57.svg
54 ms
coveralls_91.svg
51 ms
coveralls_100.svg
52 ms
coveralls_0.svg
48 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
60 ms
js
65 ms
coveralls_0.svg
40 ms
coveralls_80.svg
41 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
44 ms
coveralls_92.svg
41 ms
coveralls_100.svg
41 ms
coveralls_unknown.svg
95 ms
juliafem.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
juliafem.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
juliafem.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juliafem.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juliafem.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
juliafem.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JuliaFEM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: