Tools & Wizards About Us
mspark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

mspark.com

Mail & Digital Advertising | Reach Rural Consumers | Mspark

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

639 ms

Page Rendered

702 ms

mspark.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mspark.com now to see the best up-to-date Mspark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mspark.com

Engage rural consumers and acquire new customers. Our approach to understanding customers, identifying prospects and what motivates them drives your success.

Visit mspark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mspark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mspark.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.16

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mspark.com

30 ms

mspark.com

120 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

frontend.css

28 ms

tailwind.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Mspark.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Connect.livechatinc.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (281 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.4 kB (29%)

Content Size

254.1 kB

After Optimization

179.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mspark.com main page is 254.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 88.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 77.6 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mspark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 88.2 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 84.9 kB
  • After minification 82.7 kB
  • After compression 79.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mspark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (73%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mspark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mspark.com

mspark.com

30 ms

mspark.com

mspark.com

120 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

22 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

28 ms

tailwind.css

tailwind.css

34 ms

theme.css

theme.css

48 ms

custom.css

custom.css

42 ms

admin.css

admin.css

24 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

43 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

42 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

43 ms

handl-utm-grabber.js

handl-utm-grabber.js

100 ms

admin.js

admin.js

99 ms

widget.js

widget.js

40 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

139 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

277 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

138 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

281 ms

footer-cta-bg.svg

footer-cta-bg.svg

164 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

250 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

248 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

249 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

245 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

109 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

107 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

164 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

190 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

157 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

29 ms

hero-curve.png

hero-curve.png

33 ms

IDENTIFY-Slides_HowWeDoIt.gif

IDENTIFY-Slides_HowWeDoIt.gif

22 ms

Accessibility Review

mspark.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mspark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mspark.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mspark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mspark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mspark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mspark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: