Tools & Wizards About Us
phoenix-detailing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

phoenix-detailing.com

Phoenix Detailing | Melbourne FL | Ceramic Coating | Tint | PPF

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

595 ms

phoenix-detailing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit phoenix-detailing.com now to see the best up-to-date Phoenix Detailing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about phoenix-detailing.com

Paint Protection Film, Window Tint, Ceramic Coating at Phoenix Detailing in Melbourne FL. Visit our site or call 3217755929 for a free quote.

Visit phoenix-detailing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Phoenix-detailing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

phoenix-detailing.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

phoenix-detailing.com

108 ms

phoenix-detailing.com

144 ms

js

190 ms

fbevents.js

132 ms

main.min.css

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Phoenix-detailing.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Phoenix-detailing.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 156.2 kB

  • Original 189.7 kB
  • After minification 184.0 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phoenix Detailing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 380.5 kB
  • After minification 380.5 kB
  • After compression 374.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 148.0 kB
  • After minification 148.0 kB
  • After compression 144.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phoenix-detailing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (84%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phoenix Detailing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

phoenix-detailing.com

phoenix-detailing.com

108 ms

phoenix-detailing.com

phoenix-detailing.com

144 ms

js

js

190 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

132 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

119 ms

pa-frontend-3cc5c4a42.min.css

pa-frontend-3cc5c4a42.min.css

226 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

123 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

160 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

171 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

328 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

166 ms

remixicon.css

remixicon.css

343 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

227 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

108 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

248 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

120 ms

post-24236.css

post-24236.css

340 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

226 ms

global.css

global.css

332 ms

post-330.css

post-330.css

345 ms

post-25372.css

post-25372.css

338 ms

post-25392.css

post-25392.css

336 ms

twentytwenty.css

twentytwenty.css

335 ms

bafg-style.css

bafg-style.css

349 ms

css

css

223 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

344 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

388 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

155 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

221 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

164 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

355 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

351 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

347 ms

jquery.twentytwenty.js

jquery.twentytwenty.js

350 ms

js

js

326 ms

prettyphoto.min.css

prettyphoto.min.css

357 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

512 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

512 ms

pa-frontend-3cc5c4a42.min.js

pa-frontend-3cc5c4a42.min.js

530 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

359 ms

e-202409.js

e-202409.js

251 ms

bafg-custom-js.js

bafg-custom-js.js

366 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

529 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

375 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

509 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

547 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

156 ms

prettyPhoto.min.js

prettyPhoto.min.js

527 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

527 ms

markerclusterer.min.js

markerclusterer.min.js

564 ms

premium-maps.min.js

premium-maps.min.js

651 ms

js

js

326 ms

helper.min.js

helper.min.js

651 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

210 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

244 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

247 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

247 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

246 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

314 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

600 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

587 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

630 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

621 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

441 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

447 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

121 ms

js

js

154 ms

Untitled-1.webp

Untitled-1.webp

149 ms

IMG_7395.jpg

IMG_7395.jpg

255 ms

coating-warranty-banner-1024x512-1.jpg

coating-warranty-banner-1024x512-1.jpg

253 ms

Untitled-design-6.png

Untitled-design-6.png

1057 ms

IMG_0405-copy-scaled.webp

IMG_0405-copy-scaled.webp

306 ms

Untitled-design-3.png

Untitled-design-3.png

833 ms

susie-ppf-installer-scaled.webp

susie-ppf-installer-scaled.webp

541 ms

spray-ceramic-coating-scaled.webp

spray-ceramic-coating-scaled.webp

299 ms

Service-Disabled-Veteran-Owned-Certified-copy.webp

Service-Disabled-Veteran-Owned-Certified-copy.webp

297 ms

phoenix-detailing-trans-270x289-copy.webp

phoenix-detailing-trans-270x289-copy.webp

374 ms

font

font

174 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

228 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

138 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

109 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

172 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

93 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

219 ms

Accessibility Review

phoenix-detailing.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

phoenix-detailing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

phoenix-detailing.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phoenix-detailing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phoenix-detailing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

phoenix-detailing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phoenix Detailing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: