Tools & Wizards About Us
protact.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

protact.in

Cloud Based Practice Management Software for Tax Professional and Chartered Accountant | Protact

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

768 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

194 ms

protact.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Protact content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protact.in

Protact is India's first comprehensive cloud based practice management solution specifically designed for tax professional and service firms.

Visit protact.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Protact.in page load time and found that the first response time was 768 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protact.in performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.393

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protact.in

768 ms

protact.in

1289 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

css

42 ms

css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Protact.in, 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Protact.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.5 kB (75%)

Content Size

70.3 kB

After Optimization

17.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Protact.in main page is 70.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 58.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 50.5 kB

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.3 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 656 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 656 B or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protact.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (58%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protact.in

protact.in

768 ms

protact.in

protact.in

1289 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

css

css

42 ms

css

css

63 ms

css

css

83 ms

preloader.css

preloader.css

273 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

543 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

734 ms

animate.css

animate.css

731 ms

revolution.css

revolution.css

758 ms

style.css

style.css

1305 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

797 ms

all.css

all.css

804 ms

css

css

81 ms

css

css

81 ms

ProTact_Logo.png

ProTact_Logo.png

978 ms

Grow_your_practice.jpg

Grow_your_practice.jpg

976 ms

Service_your_client.jpg

Service_your_client.jpg

1011 ms

Direct_Tax_Compliance.jpg

Direct_Tax_Compliance.jpg

1328 ms

Direct_Tax_Controversy.jpg

Direct_Tax_Controversy.jpg

1069 ms

gst_img3.jpg

gst_img3.jpg

1460 ms

Document_Manager01.jpg

Document_Manager01.jpg

1464 ms

Job_manager01.jpg

Job_manager01.jpg

1512 ms

Knowledge_Management01.jpg

Knowledge_Management01.jpg

1334 ms

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

1567 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1598 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

2126 ms

fontawesome-markers.min.js

fontawesome-markers.min.js

2200 ms

library.js

library.js

1706 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1765 ms

form-validation.js

form-validation.js

1835 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1871 ms

enable_remote_access2.jpg

enable_remote_access2.jpg

1953 ms

Comprehensive-45(Orange).png

Comprehensive-45(Orange).png

2022 ms

Functionalities-45(Orange).png

Functionalities-45(Orange).png

2100 ms

AcrossDevices-45(Orange).png

AcrossDevices-45(Orange).png

2140 ms

Fully-Secured-45(Orange).png

Fully-Secured-45(Orange).png

2200 ms

logoRed(200X50).png

logoRed(200X50).png

2277 ms

all.css

all.css

1571 ms

all.css

all.css

1597 ms

all.css

all.css

1617 ms

all.css

all.css

1655 ms

polaris.css

polaris.css

1654 ms

futurico.css

futurico.css

1739 ms

PreLoader.gif

PreLoader.gif

279 ms

home_page_banner08-1.jpg

home_page_banner08-1.jpg

254 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQ.woff

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4kaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4kaVQ.woff

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4kaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4kaVQ.woff

50 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4kaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4kaVQ.woff

51 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4kaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4kaVQ.woff

52 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

51 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

52 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

50 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

53 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

529 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

52 ms

Accessibility Review

protact.in accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

protact.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

protact.in SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protact.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protact.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protact.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: