1.6 sec in total
65 ms
764 ms
732 ms
Click here to check amazing Reading content for Puerto Rico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reading.com
Backed by expert science, Reading.com offers parents a revolutionary step by step program that makes teaching your child to read easy and fun. Start today!
Visit reading.comWe analyzed Reading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
reading.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
18/100
10%
65 ms
35 ms
173 ms
54 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Reading.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) belongs to the original domain Reading.com.
Page size can be reduced by 209.0 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
931.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Reading.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 497.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.7 kB or 42% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 174 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reading images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 132 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reading.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (58%)
26
11
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reading.com
65 ms
reading.com
35 ms
www.reading.com
173 ms
rw.js
54 ms
j.php
72 ms
0.styles.578e566b.css
57 ms
js
94 ms
email-decode.min.js
28 ms
app.03cf8b65.js
109 ms
page--src--pages--index-vue.95b3afdd.js
76 ms
page--src--pages--giftcard-vue~page--src--pages--index-vue~page--src--pages--teachers-vue.43c0543c.js
50 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
110 ms
css2
68 ms
css2
70 ms
page--src--pages--404-vue.5dac68e4.js
93 ms
fbevents.js
91 ms
raisingreaders_app_extralarge_darktm.png
123 ms
readingcom-logo-white.png
134 ms
readingcom-logo-black.png
141 ms
tc-icons-bg.0aa9e968.svg
74 ms
avatar-03.png
134 ms
avatar-08.png
133 ms
font
22 ms
font
167 ms
page--src--pages--account-deletion-request-vue.0e649f78.js
27 ms
page--src--pages--affiliates-vue.d42fa386.js
23 ms
page--src--pages--childrens-privacy-policy-vue.2fa38e13.js
23 ms
page--src--pages--class-vue.f085256e.js
30 ms
page--src--pages--coming-soon-vue.5b470e7c.js
28 ms
page--src--pages--complete-vue.52e3f184.js
40 ms
reading.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
reading.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reading.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reading.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reading. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: