26.3 sec in total
523 ms
23.2 sec
2.6 sec
Welcome to redolux.com homepage info - get ready to check REDOLUX best content right away, or after learning these important things about redolux.com
Discover The Exact DIY You Need lights Bulbs Portable lights Accessories REDOLUX REDOLUX provides essential lamps, light sources,
Visit redolux.comWe analyzed Redolux.com page load time and found that the first response time was 523 ms and then it took 25.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
redolux.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
523 ms
401 ms
60 ms
113 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Redolux.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source V1.cnzz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 91.0 kB (6%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Redolux.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. REDOLUX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redolux.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)
45
16
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REDOLUX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
redolux.com
523 ms
redolux.com
401 ms
grid.css
60 ms
style.css
113 ms
camera.css
149 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
145 ms
owl-carousel.css
146 ms
google-map.css
146 ms
search.css
144 ms
styleswitcher.css
152 ms
jquery.js
248 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
178 ms
script.js
182 ms
device.min.js
177 ms
buttons.js
8 ms
loader.js
18 ms
999bfc835f5008405f838e4ed80a5e65.jpg
269 ms
a7fc721676708b2c503eaf33d39eabf0.jpg
220 ms
75cb058d99b83b5f17acd2b7089ed873.jpg
511 ms
dac6f4daf31d874686c595f164caceaf.jpg
510 ms
23b1aa9a4afebc6ee54048cadd630cc1.jpg.thumb.jpg
260 ms
94234c44290b6b453bd5fcaaf31e8af1.jpg.thumb.jpg
297 ms
506f892dda32e26f0d1404fe64d88ed7.jpg.thumb.jpg
283 ms
0cb7ee681200559c5c100724a0170442.JPG.thumb.jpg
340 ms
2e24a532a534bf0845d5b3df9483bf20.jpg.thumb.jpg
339 ms
844dd6f0484ea9fb4112aa0ea68820e8.jpg.thumb.jpg
331 ms
ec69d02515c17c315f060c7ee11d8871.jpg.thumb.jpg
340 ms
e923e31a2a9bff370161e02419ebeec5.jpg.thumb.jpg
375 ms
buttons.js
49 ms
loader.js
50 ms
animate.css
286 ms
font-awesome.min.css
283 ms
css
51 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
38 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
47 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
157 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
158 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
175 ms
jquery.cookie.js
108 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
84 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
103 ms
camera.js
82 ms
rd-smoothscroll.min.js
100 ms
superfish.js
166 ms
jquery.rd-navbar.js
165 ms
jquery.form.min.js
163 ms
jquery.rd-mailform.min.c.js
169 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
163 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
197 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
196 ms
jquery.rd-parallax.js
198 ms
TMSearch.js
194 ms
jquery.rd-styleswitcher.js
193 ms
stat.php
20118 ms
camera-loader.gif
781 ms
df899e197d8a3efff98cc86eaf721171.jpg
193 ms
a8e248ea3519d0a2ea7c2cbe05dbb2ac.jpg
95 ms
redolux.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
redolux.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
redolux.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redolux.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redolux.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redolux.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REDOLUX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: