Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

sandicliffe.co.uk

New & Used Cars, Servicing & Parts from Sandicliffe | Sandicliffe Homepage

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

sandicliffe.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sandicliffe.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Sandicliffe best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about sandicliffe.co.uk

At Sandicliffe, we offer a wide range of new and used cars, as well as servicing and parts. Visit our home page to explore our full selection and find the perfect car for you!

Visit sandicliffe.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Sandicliffe.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sandicliffe.co.uk performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value15,370 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.45

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sandicliffe.co.uk

267 ms

www.sandicliffe.co.uk

1982 ms

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

223 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

232 ms

Our browser made a total of 194 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Sandicliffe.co.uk, 40% (78 requests) were made to Images.sandicliffe.co.uk and 4% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Images.sandicliffe.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (12%)

Content Size

23.2 MB

After Optimization

20.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Sandicliffe.co.uk main page is 23.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 20.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 203.3 kB

  • Original 236.4 kB
  • After minification 186.5 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 203.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 309.3 kB

  • Original 20.4 MB
  • After minification 20.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sandicliffe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 506.7 kB

  • Original 709.1 kB
  • After minification 539.6 kB
  • After compression 202.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 506.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 146.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandicliffe.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (24%)

Requests Now

182

After Optimization

138

The browser has sent 182 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sandicliffe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sandicliffe.co.uk accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sandicliffe.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sandicliffe.co.uk SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandicliffe.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sandicliffe.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sandicliffe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: