Tools & Wizards About Us
sigma100.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

sigma100.com

Non Asbestos Products Manufacturer, Non Asbestos Packing, PTFE & Graphite Packing, Gaskets in Mumbai, India

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

sigma100.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sigma 100 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sigma100.com

Manufacturer of Seals, Non Asbestos Packing, Ceramic & Glassfibre Textile Products, PTFTE Gaskets,Carbon Packing, Customised Gaskets, Industrial Gaskets

Visit sigma100.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigma100.com page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigma100.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigma100.com

290 ms

bootstrap.min.css

132 ms

css

24 ms

css

41 ms

font-awesome-4.3.0.min.css

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Sigma100.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) belongs to the original domain Sigma100.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigma100.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 39.5 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 73.7 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sigma 100 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 235.7 kB
  • After minification 235.7 kB
  • After compression 120.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigma100.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (27%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

47

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigma 100. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigma100.com

sigma100.com

290 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

132 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

41 ms

font-awesome-4.3.0.min.css

font-awesome-4.3.0.min.css

140 ms

flaticon.min.css

flaticon.min.css

131 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

139 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

138 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

js

js

62 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

316 ms

jssor.js

jssor.js

208 ms

jssor.slider.js

jssor.slider.js

271 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

269 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

204 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

199 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

270 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

272 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

272 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

314 ms

logo.png

logo.png

214 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

214 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

304 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

257 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

290 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

287 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

296 ms

slide6.jpg

slide6.jpg

362 ms

p1.jpg

p1.jpg

310 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

352 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

353 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

360 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

369 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

374 ms

p7.jpg

p7.jpg

415 ms

p8.jpg

p8.jpg

417 ms

p9.jpg

p9.jpg

424 ms

p10.jpg

p10.jpg

423 ms

p11.jpg

p11.jpg

430 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

436 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

475 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

478 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

492 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

491 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

491 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

498 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

491 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

492 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

498 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

435 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

435 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

12 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

14 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

15 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

441 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

481 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

485 ms

16.jpg

16.jpg

452 ms

17.jpg

17.jpg

408 ms

18.jpg

18.jpg

413 ms

19.jpg

19.jpg

417 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

406 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

385 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

392 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

393 ms

b21.png

b21.png

386 ms

a21.png

a21.png

382 ms

who-we-are.jpg

who-we-are.jpg

378 ms

our-vision.jpg

our-vision.jpg

437 ms

Accessibility Review

sigma100.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

sigma100.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sigma100.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigma100.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sigma100.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigma100.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sigma 100. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: