Tools & Wizards About Us
timeslice.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

timeslice.co.uk

Legal Software | Cloud Hosting| Practice Management Software | Legal Document Management Software | Matter Management Software | Case Management Syste...

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

timeslice.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit timeslice.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Timeslice content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about timeslice.co.uk

Lawman provides legal accounting software, document management, case management and practice management software for solicitors law firms. LAWMAN is Timeslices Legal Practice - Case and Matter Managem...

Visit timeslice.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Timeslice.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

timeslice.co.uk performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

timeslice.co.uk

1430 ms

index.php

278 ms

squeezebox.css

262 ms

bootstrap.min.css

532 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

354 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Timeslice.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Timeslice.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 539.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

945.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Timeslice.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 679.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 37.0 kB
  • After minification 36.0 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 679.5 kB
  • After minification 659.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timeslice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 344.3 kB

  • Original 592.4 kB
  • After minification 578.4 kB
  • After compression 248.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 146.4 kB

  • Original 175.9 kB
  • After minification 164.0 kB
  • After compression 29.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timeslice.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (63%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timeslice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

timeslice.co.uk

timeslice.co.uk

1430 ms

index.php

index.php

278 ms

squeezebox.css

squeezebox.css

262 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

532 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

354 ms

bootstrap-extended.css

bootstrap-extended.css

271 ms

wall.css

wall.css

271 ms

css

css

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

351 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

540 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

396 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

396 ms

caption.js

caption.js

441 ms

core.js

core.js

442 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

575 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

843 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

567 ms

squeezebox.min.js

squeezebox.min.js

568 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

622 ms

wallFX.js

wallFX.js

624 ms

jquery-latest.pack.js

jquery-latest.pack.js

14 ms

sidr.js

sidr.js

659 ms

script.js

script.js

659 ms

altr.css

altr.css

669 ms

css

css

35 ms

cookiewarning.js

cookiewarning.js

724 ms

js

js

77 ms

burger.png

burger.png

110 ms

timeslice-logo.png

timeslice-logo.png

110 ms

timeslice-logo-white.png

timeslice-logo-white.png

111 ms

arrowdown.png

arrowdown.png

111 ms

prev.png

prev.png

91 ms

next.png

next.png

108 ms

cyber-essentials-badge-high-res-bw.png

cyber-essentials-badge-high-res-bw.png

351 ms

microsoft-gold-partner.png

microsoft-gold-partner.png

185 ms

r.png

r.png

188 ms

trustwave-seal.png

trustwave-seal.png

189 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

29 ms

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

30 ms

futurabt-heavy-opentype-webfont.woff

futurabt-heavy-opentype-webfont.woff

168 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

247 ms

futurabt-light-opentype-webfont.woff

futurabt-light-opentype-webfont.woff

242 ms

welcome.jpg

welcome.jpg

571 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

Accessibility Review

timeslice.co.uk accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

timeslice.co.uk best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

timeslice.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timeslice.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Timeslice.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

timeslice.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Timeslice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: