Tools & Wizards About Us
videoproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

videoproject.com

THE VIDEO PROJECT - Media on the Critical Issues of Our Time

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

videoproject.com screenshot

About Website

Visit videoproject.com now to see the best up-to-date VIDEO PROJECT content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videoproject.com

A primary source for top-rated media programs that inform people of all ages to the critical challenges of our time and positive solutions to those challenges.

Visit videoproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Videoproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videoproject.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.videoproject.com

112 ms

css-base.css

20 ms

css-element.css

21 ms

css-edits.css

21 ms

custom.css

986 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Videoproject.com, 71% (40 requests) were made to Site.videoproject.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Site.videoproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Videoproject.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VIDEO PROJECT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 44.7 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.7 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videoproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (15%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VIDEO PROJECT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.videoproject.com

www.videoproject.com

112 ms

css-base.css

css-base.css

20 ms

css-element.css

css-element.css

21 ms

css-edits.css

css-edits.css

21 ms

custom.css

custom.css

986 ms

DVD-Amaray-Apes-front.jpg

DVD-Amaray-Apes-front.jpg

262 ms

ywa.js

ywa.js

49 ms

BigVoice-DVD-Cover-front.jpg

BigVoice-DVD-Cover-front.jpg

1017 ms

shout-cover.jpeg

shout-cover.jpeg

961 ms

Natures-Orchestra-Amaray-Front-sm.jpg

Natures-Orchestra-Amaray-Front-sm.jpg

1050 ms

BURDEN_DVD_Cover-Front.jpg

BURDEN_DVD_Cover-Front.jpg

1017 ms

my-depression-front-cover.jpg

my-depression-front-cover.jpg

1048 ms

The-Battle-of-Amfar_DVD-Front_Cover.jpg

The-Battle-of-Amfar_DVD-Front_Cover.jpg

1017 ms

CH-DVDAmaray_front.jpg

CH-DVDAmaray_front.jpg

1049 ms

Breaking-Point_front.jpg

Breaking-Point_front.jpg

1049 ms

Threatened_front.jpg

Threatened_front.jpg

1072 ms

LubeJob_Amaray_front.jpg

LubeJob_Amaray_front.jpg

1068 ms

PICTURES_HIROSHIMA_DVD_front.jpg

PICTURES_HIROSHIMA_DVD_front.jpg

1069 ms

BillionsToNone-front-cover-300.jpg

BillionsToNone-front-cover-300.jpg

1067 ms

Plant-this-movie-frontcover.jpg

Plant-this-movie-frontcover.jpg

1107 ms

Simple-Nature-FrontCover.jpg

Simple-Nature-FrontCover.jpg

1133 ms

Polygon-cover.jpg

Polygon-cover.jpg

1100 ms

Jens-Jensen-Cover-200px.jpg

Jens-Jensen-Cover-200px.jpg

1135 ms

Immortalists-frontcover.jpg

Immortalists-frontcover.jpg

1087 ms

HIGO-Cover-200px.jpg

HIGO-Cover-200px.jpg

1091 ms

2015-catalog-cover.jpg

2015-catalog-cover.jpg

1155 ms

css-base.css

css-base.css

36 ms

yhst-34539175858584_2272_22578713

yhst-34539175858584_2272_22578713

36 ms

Join_us_on_facebook.jpg

Join_us_on_facebook.jpg

151 ms

FindingTheGold-cover-200.jpg

FindingTheGold-cover-200.jpg

149 ms

The-Last-One-Cover.jpg

The-Last-One-Cover.jpg

152 ms

Barber_of_Birmingham-front.jpg

Barber_of_Birmingham-front.jpg

199 ms

Ferraro_cover_front.png

Ferraro_cover_front.png

223 ms

Garwin_front.jpg

Garwin_front.jpg

172 ms

DVD-Amaray-Pembe.jpg

DVD-Amaray-Pembe.jpg

176 ms

WITW_tempcover.jpg

WITW_tempcover.jpg

211 ms

PrettySlick_front.jpg

PrettySlick_front.jpg

208 ms

AOM_Amaray-front.jpg

AOM_Amaray-front.jpg

197 ms

Bipolarized_front.jpg

Bipolarized_front.jpg

193 ms

MilkyWay_cover.jpg

MilkyWay_cover.jpg

239 ms

stolen-education-frontcover.jpg

stolen-education-frontcover.jpg

225 ms

GrowingUpGreen_WebCover.jpg

GrowingUpGreen_WebCover.jpg

235 ms

FREETHEMINDCOVER.png

FREETHEMINDCOVER.png

249 ms

Drying-For-Freedom-frontcover.jpg

Drying-For-Freedom-frontcover.jpg

241 ms

great-turning-cover-frontsm.jpg

great-turning-cover-frontsm.jpg

264 ms

ga.js

ga.js

10 ms

DMLP_FRONT_cover.jpg

DMLP_FRONT_cover.jpg

250 ms

Released_FrontCover-sm.jpg

Released_FrontCover-sm.jpg

251 ms

video_project_logo_web.jpg

video_project_logo_web.jpg

259 ms

css-base.css

css-base.css

27 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

27 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

8 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

b75d4105cc1f3beeeee09b7eac9ddde1

b75d4105cc1f3beeeee09b7eac9ddde1

18 ms

Accessibility Review

videoproject.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

videoproject.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

videoproject.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videoproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Videoproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

videoproject.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VIDEO PROJECT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: