Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

e2bcal.com

e2b Calibration Services, now Transcat's Cleveland Calibration Lab | Transcat | Transcat

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

864 ms

Page Rendered

2 sec

About Website

Visit e2bcal.com now to see the best up-to-date E2b Cal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e2bcal.com

Transcat's Cleveland Calibration Lab, formerly e2b calibration, offers accredited calibration services which includes GSE certification, electronic, physical-dimensional calibration, and more.

Visit e2bcal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed E2bcal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e2bcal.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,190 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.573

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e2bcal.com

31 ms

e2b-calibration-services

155 ms

38d2dd845c03f84b6e5d496e69aa77c0.min.css

103 ms

13e7b12f187ad591e5b78a346b9cf5f6.min.js

88 ms

gtm.js

314 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E2bcal.com, 93% (27 requests) were made to Transcat.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (354 ms) relates to the external source Transcat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 317.3 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

859.6 kB

In fact, the total size of E2bcal.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 628.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 272.6 kB

  • Original 313.8 kB
  • After minification 302.2 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 628.6 kB
  • After minification 584.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E2b Cal images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 597 B

  • Original 234.6 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 234.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E2bcal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E2b Cal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

e2bcal.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

e2bcal.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

e2bcal.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E2bcal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E2bcal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E2b Cal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: