4.2 sec in total
754 ms
2.1 sec
1.3 sec
Visit stackposts.com now to see the best up-to-date Stackposts content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stackposts.com
Scheduling your posts to analyze and optimize performance on many social media platforms
Visit stackposts.comWe analyzed Stackposts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 754 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
stackposts.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
754 ms
83 ms
80 ms
75 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Stackposts.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (775 ms) belongs to the original domain Stackposts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 182.0 kB (8%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Stackposts.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.9 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stackposts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stackposts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (48%)
80
42
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stackposts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stackposts.com
754 ms
animate.css
83 ms
font-awesome.min.css
80 ms
fontello.css
75 ms
jquery-ui.css
81 ms
lnr-icon.css
74 ms
owl.carousel.css
87 ms
slick.css
85 ms
trumbowyg.min.css
86 ms
pagination.min.css
151 ms
izitoast.css
103 ms
bootstrap.min.css
93 ms
style.css
108 ms
jquery-1.12.3.js
150 ms
js
158 ms
email-decode.min.js
53 ms
popper.min.js
150 ms
uikit.min.js
162 ms
bootstrap.min.js
150 ms
chart.bundle.min.js
156 ms
grid.min.js
152 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
151 ms
jquery.barrating.min.js
152 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
156 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
154 ms
jquery.easing1.3.js
160 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
156 ms
slick.min.js
161 ms
tether.min.js
160 ms
trumbowyg.min.js
160 ms
waypoints.min.js
159 ms
pagination.min.js
179 ms
izitoast.min.js
169 ms
dashboard.js
168 ms
tinymce.min.js
179 ms
main.js
168 ms
core.js
169 ms
css
70 ms
css2
87 ms
integrate_24bf6acef40c076544c67d2e36fd82e9.js
338 ms
1682346789_5ad5b8c9612f0a655644.png
327 ms
usr_avatar.png
145 ms
hero_area_bg.jpg
159 ms
feature1.svg
327 ms
feature2.svg
334 ms
feature3.svg
347 ms
countbg.jpg
145 ms
bundlebg.jpg
157 ms
bubdle.svg
377 ms
fac1.svg
391 ms
fac4.svg
383 ms
fac3.svg
549 ms
sociallogo-01.png
357 ms
sociallogo-02.png
359 ms
sociallogo-03.png
357 ms
sociallogo-04.png
380 ms
sociallogo-05.png
381 ms
sociallogo-06.png
380 ms
sociallogo-07.png
381 ms
sociallogo-08.png
401 ms
sociallogo-09.png
401 ms
sociallogo-10.png
402 ms
sociallogo-11.png
402 ms
sociallogo-12.png
402 ms
who01.jpg
403 ms
who02.jpg
403 ms
who03.jpg
404 ms
who04.jpg
405 ms
bbg.png
406 ms
buy.png
406 ms
sbg.png
406 ms
sell.png
407 ms
testibg.jpg
414 ms
avata1.jpg
411 ms
avata2.jpg
414 ms
avata3.jpg
419 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FO_F87jxeebC.ttf
176 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk7PFO_F87jxeebC.ttf
240 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk6jFO_F87jxeebC.ttf
259 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59FO_F87jxeebC.ttf
336 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4jE-_F87jxeebC.ttf
228 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE-_F87jxeebC.ttf
239 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E-_F87jxeebC.ttf
259 ms
Linearicons-Free.woff
767 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
775 ms
main.js
8 ms
avata4.jpg
272 ms
spf1.svg
473 ms
spf2.svg
467 ms
calltobg.jpg
114 ms
stackposts.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
stackposts.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stackposts.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stackposts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stackposts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stackposts.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stackposts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: